Feedipedia
Animal feed resources information system
Feedipedia
Feedipedia

Did you find the information you were looking for? Is it valuable to you? Feedipedia is encountering funding shortage. We need your help to keep providing reference-based feeding recommendations for your animals.
Would you consider donating? If yes, please click on the button Donate.

Any amount is the welcome. Even one cent is helpful to us!

Sugarcane bagasse

Datasheet

Description
Click on the "Nutritional aspects" tab for recommendations for ruminants, pigs, poultry, rabbits, horses, fish and crustaceans
Common names 

Bagasse [English]; bagasse [French]; bagazo [Spanish]; bagaço [Portuguese]; xác mía [Vietnamese]; باغاس [Arabic]; 渣, 渣滓, 渣子 [Chinese]; باگاس [Farsi]; खोई [Hindi]; バガス [Japanese]; ชานอ้อย [Thai]

Taxonomic information 

Although the botanical name Saccharum officinarum L. is commonly used for sugarcane, most modern commercial cultivars are complex interspecific hybrids of Saccharum spp. (Irvine, 1999; Kew POWO, 2026).

Description 

Sugarcane bagasse is the fibrous residue left after sugarcane stalks have been crushed to extract their juice. There are two main types of bagasse.

  • Factory bagasse is produced in sugar or ethanol mills where repeated crushing, imbibition and juice extraction remove most of the soluble contents. It is generally obtained as a moist, bulky material.  Much of the bagasse provides the energy required for the operation of the factory. 
  • Pressed cane stalks, or farm bagasse is obtained from on-farm or small factory cane fractionation that uses only 2 or 3 crushers. Due to the reduced efficiency of the extraction process (50% vs. 70% extraction rate), it contains higher amounts of sugar-rich juice and is more valuable for ruminants (Preston, 1995).

During the process, the fibre is passed through sieves to remove coarse vascular fibre bundles and fine parenchymatous particles known as pith or bagacillo. Bagasse pith (or pith bagasse) may be used as a filter aid later in the process, or as a feedstuff.

For feeding purposes, bagasse may be offered fresh, dried, chopped, ground or pelleted. It may also be treated with steam under pressure, sodium or calcium alkalis, anhydrous ammonia or urea, or by biological and enzymatic processes. As with other fibrous materials, dry bagasse is often used as litter for pigs and poultry. The bagasse is then recycled into organic fertilizer. Sometimes, when local regulations authorise it, poultry litter may be incorporated in ruminant diets as a feedstuff rich in non-protein nitrogen.

Distribution 

Sugarcane bagasse is available in tropical and subtropical regions, where and when cane is crushed. Its availability is therefore concentrated around sugar and ethanol mills and small-scale crushers during the milling season. The amount potentially available for feeding is smaller than gross bagasse output because much of the material is used at the mill to provide fuel, while its moisture and low bulk density restrict storage and transport.

World sugarcane production exceeded 2 billion t in 2023 (FAO, 2024). Brazil is the leading producer and India and Thailand are other major centres (OECD-FAO, 2024). Bagasse output is related to the quantity of cane actually crushed. A Brazilian operational report for the 2012/13 season recorded 165 million t of bagasse (reference moisture content of 50%) from 589 million t of cane crushed. Bagasse represented 24–32% of cane weight among mills, with a national value of 28% (Conab, 2017). An Indian national methodology used a recovery factor of 0.30 to estimate 102 million t of bagasse from 339 million t of cane crushed in 2022/23 and 95 million t from 318 million t in 2023/24 (MoSPI, 2026).

Gross bagasse production is not a measure of feed availability because mills commonly retain the material for process heat and electricity. Brazilian mill data described bagasse as normally consumed on site to produce steam and power (Conab, 2017). The Indian national methodology assumed that 90% of estimated bagasse was used as fuel and assigned the other 10% to non-energy uses without quantifying the share used as animal feed (MoSPI, 2026).

Availability is seasonal, and conservation is required when bagasse is to be fed after the crushing period. The Indian cogeneration methodology assumed 210 operating days per year for sugar mills and explicitly related this operating period to seasonal bagasse availability (MoSPI, 2026). In a five-month conservation experiment using bagasse from artisanal cachaça production at the Federal University of Lavras, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, whole and chopped bagasse silages had fresh matter densities of 240 and 300 kg/m³, respectively, corresponding to 124 and 155 kg DM/m³ (Pereira, 2006).

Processes 

Physical processing

Bagasse can be ground to reduce particle size and increase bulk density of bagasse up to 80% (Reddy et al., 1993).

Steam pressure

Steam pressure is the most efficient method to increase digestibility that appears to have application on an industrial scale. It solubilises the hemicelluloses through the release of acetic acid. This technique is particularly appropriate at the sugar mill where there is surplus steam and where the necessary technical knowledge and equipment are also available. This technology has been applied commercially in intensive cattle fattening in Colombia (though it was later discontinued), Brazil and India (Preston, 1995).

Alkali treatments

Alkali treatments with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or calcium compounds disrupt bonds between lignin and structural carbohydrates and increase fibre digestibility. These treatments also change the mineral content and alkalinity of the product (Firdos et al., 1989; Suksombat, 2004). NaOH treatment of factory bagasse is an effective method that has been employed in Cuba on a large scale (Preston, 1995). It is however too costly and this technique is not considered sustainable (Suksombat, 2004). There are also issues with pollution (Preston, 1995).

Ammoniation and urea treatment

The use of anhydrous ammonia or urea increases non-protein nitrogen content and may improve fibre utilisation. Urea treatment requires enough moisture for urea hydrolysis and sealed storage for an adequate treatment period. In laboratory experiments conducted in Guadeloupe, French West Indies, more than 90% of the urea was hydrolysed after two weeks when bagasse moisture was 70% (Hassoun et al., 1990).

Biological treatments

Biological treatments with fungi, enzymes or lactic acid bacteria, and enrichment with vinasse, can modify fibre fractions, fermentation and nutrient content (Okano et al., 2006).

Environmental impact 

The environmental effect of feeding sugarcane bagasse depends on what would otherwise happen to the material and on the transport, conservation and processing required to make it usable. Feeding a local surplus can recover a by-product that might otherwise deteriorate, but feed use is not automatically an environmental benefit when bagasse already supplies process energy or when substantial drying, transport or chemical treatment is required.

Competing uses

Feed use is most favourable when it uses a local surplus rather than diverting bagasse from an existing efficient use. Bagasse supplies steam and electricity in sugar mills, so using it as feed may displace an established energy function (Conab, 2017; MoSPI, 2026).

Assessments of feed manufacture show that using bagasse as feed is not an environmental benefit by default. In an Iranian assessment of feed production from sugarcane bagasse, the energy input exceeded the energy assigned to the feed output; bagasse, electricity and natural gas were the main contributors to the reported energy use (Azadeh et al., 2024). In another Iranian study, the production of compost, livestock feed and medium fibreboard from bagasse had markedly different energy and environmental profiles (Mousavi et al., 2025).

Storage and handling

Poorly managed bagasse stocks can affect workers, surrounding communities, water and the stored biomass itself. In an Australian modelling study, large uncovered stockpiles were associated with potential nuisance dust, groundwater seepage, spontaneous combustion and contaminated leachates. Removing the pith reduced the dust number by about 50%, reduced the modelled peak 24-hour ground-level PM10 concentration from 32.4 to 9.4 µg/m³, and reduced water-holding capacity by 43% (Rainey et al., 2013).

Water exposure promotes decomposition during storage. In a 150-day industrial storage experiment designed to assess calorific value for combustion in Minas Gerais State, Brazil, repeatedly wetted bagasse had the greatest deterioration and loss of calorific value, associated with fermentation and decomposer fungi (Santos et al., 2011).

Processing and treatment

The environmental burden of upgrading bagasse depends on the reagent and dose, the water and energy required, and the fate of liquid and solid residues. When NaOH treatment is used, sodium may be excreted by animals receiving treated material. Generic FAO guidance for chemically treated crop residues in China described NaOH as expensive and corrosive and warned that sodium excretion and long-term accumulation in soils may cause fertility problems and environmental pollution (Meng, 2002).

Nutritional aspects
Nutritional attributes 

The dry matter of sugarcane bagasse mostly supplies structural fibre, contains almost no protein (<1%) and little energy. Untreated bagasse is lignified, poorly digestible and may limit intake or dilute dietary energy. Its exact composition varies with the cane cultivar, juice-extraction efficiency, contamination with soil or mineral matter, proportion of pith, and subsequent drying or storage, but it remains a bulky feed of low nutrient density. Physical, steam, chemical, or biological processing can change the composition and nutritional value of bagasse.

Potential constraints 

Sugarcane bagasse presents storage and processing constraints.

Storage and hygienic quality

Moist bagasse should be conserved promptly and protected from water and air. Low density makes it difficult to compact, while residual air and repeated wetting favour fermentation and fungal deterioration. Dirty, visibly mouldy, heated or rotten material should be rejected. In a five-month conservation experiment in Minas Gerais, Brazil, bagasse from artisanal cachaça production was ensiled whole or chopped, or stored in bales. Fungal spoilage caused losses of approximately 25–30% of the whole bagasse ensiled, mainly in the upper part of the silos. Visible mould occurred in every bale examined, and Aspergillus niger, Penicillium sp. and Fusarium sp. were isolated. No aflatoxin was detected in the tested samples (Pereira, 2006). 

Bagasse intended for feeding should be dried or ensiled under conditions appropriate to the product and protected during storage. General guidance for low-quality crop residues states that dirty, mouldy or rotten material must not be treated with urea because it can yield a poor and potentially dangerous feed (Suttie, 2000).

Dust and handling

Drying, grinding, screening, conveying and handling bagasse can generate dust, particularly from the fine pith fraction. Dust control, ventilation and suitable personal protection are needed wherever these operations create airborne material. An Australian laboratory and modelling study confirmed that the fine pith fraction contributed to dust generation and that depithing reduced both the dust number and modelled PM10 concentrations around an industrial stockpile (Rainey et al., 2013).

Steam pressure

Steam treatment may increase degradability while also generating acids and furfural from hemicellulose. In a Mauritius trial, total acids and furfural production increased with steam pressure and treatment duration, and furfural exceeded 3% of bagasse DM under the stronger conditions tested (Wong You Cheong et al., 1974).

Chemical treatments

NaOH is corrosive, can leave residual alkali in the treated material and requires protective equipment (Hadjipanayiotou, 1985). General guidance for lignocellulosic residues describes urea treatment as a wet process followed by airtight storage, and notes that ammonia treatment does not leave the residual alkali associated with NaOH (Hadjipanayiotou, 1985; Suttie, 2000). Anhydrous ammonia can cause severe burns, blindness, lung damage or death and should be applied only with appropriate equipment, personal protection and training. Soluble sugars can react with ammonia to form 4-methylimidazole, a compound associated with neurological toxicity in cattle. This warning is most relevant to incompletely extracted bagasse from small-scale crushers that may retain more soluble sugars (Lalman et al., 2017).

Ruminants 

Raw bagasse is a poor, fibrous roughage mostly used for ruminants. Its ingestibility, nutrient density and digestibility (about 30%) are very low. However, it is sometimes the only roughage available on-farm. When production targets are high, as with all low-quality roughages, its use must be accompanied by significant amounts of concentrate supplementation that bring nitrogen and fermentable energy to the rumen for optimal microbial activities, and energy and by-pass protein.

In vitro studies

In the French West Indies, urea treatment increased in vitro DM digestibility from 31% in untreated bagasse to about 39-40%, whereas adding a small amount of rumen fluid as a urease source had no significant effect (Hassoun et al., 1990). 

In a Japanese in vitro study, culturing bagasse for 12 weeks with Lentinula edodes increased organic matter (OM) digestibility from 45.6 to 68.6% and NDF digestibility from 40 to 59%. Two strains of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora produced smaller improvements, whereas Pleurotus eryngii and P. salmoneostramineus did not improve digestibility (Okano et al., 2006). In Brazil, the treatment that gave the highest in situ digestibility in Jersey cows was a pressure of 19 kg/cm² for 6 minutes, but while steam treating the bagasse nearly doubled its potential degradability, its effective degradability was only 48% after 48 h rumen incubation (Basile et al., 1990).

Dairy cattle

Untreated bagasse

Untreated bagasse can serve as the sole roughage component of highly supplemented diets for moderate-producing dairy cows, and it can replace part of another low-quality roughage as a source of physically effective fibre. However, increasing its proportion in the diet may depress intake and milk yield. 

In an Iranian study with low-forage dairy diets, replacing wheat straw with bagasse increased rumination and total chewing time, and bagasse supplied more physically effective NDF than wheat straw; however, NDF digestibility decreased (Molavian et al., 2020). In a trial in Pernambuco State, Brazil, with ten mid-lactation Girolando cows, a control diet based on spineless cactus already contained 25% bagasse on a DM basis. Experimental diets contained 45–60% bagasse as the sole roughage and were balanced with concentrate for a target milk yield of 12 kg/day. DM and OM intake and digestibility, and milk yield, at 45 and 50% bagasse were similar to those obtained with the control diet. At 55 and 60%, intake, digestibility and milk yield were lower, and several response variables declined linearly as bagasse inclusion increased (Almeida et al., 2018).

In an Iranian experiment in Iran, nine mid-lactation Holstein cows received low-forage diets containing a total of 27% wheat straw plus bagasse. Bagasse replaced wheat straw at 0, 9 or 18% of diet dry matter. DM intake and milk yield were not affected during the 21-day periods, but the digestibility of OM, crude protein (CP) and NDF decreased linearly. Rumination time increased, while ruminal pH measured four hours after feeding decreased (Molavian et al., 2020).

NaOH and urea treatments

In a Thai comparison using four non-lactating dairy cows, 3 or 6% NaOH, alone or combined with urea, increased the 48-hour degradability of bagasse DM and crude fibre, whereas urea alone increased CP content but did not improve degradability. NaOH treatments also increased ash content because the added mineral remained in the treated material. Treatment with 5-6% NaOH was reported to achieve a three-to-four fold increase in digestibility and was found to be more efficient than treatment with urea and combinations of urea and NaOH (Suksombat, 2004).

Beef cattle

Untreated bagasse is used mainly as a roughage or fibre source in beef diets. Moderate inclusion can support growth in fully supplemented diets, while responses to urea, alkali or steam treatment depend on the complete process and ration.

Untreated bagasse

In a trial with six Nellore steers in São Paulo State, Brazil fed high-concentrate diets formulated with equal amounts of NDF from roughage, the bagasse diet (10% of diet DM) had the lowest DM intake and the greatest rumen fill among diets supplying similar amounts of roughage NDF from maize silage, sugarcane, soybean hulls or cottonseed hulls (Goulart et al., 2020). Moderate amounts of finely ground bagasse can be incorporated into fully supplemented complete diets. In Puerto Rico, sixteen Holstein-Friesian or Brown Swiss male calves, four per diet, received 20 or 30% finely ground, partially depithed bagasse, 20% molasses and either about 12 or 16% CP. Average daily gain (ADF), feed intake and feed conversion did not differ significantly among the four diets. The 30% bagasse diets caused greater preslaughter liveweight shrink, and efficiency tended to deteriorate as the long feeding period progressed (Randel, 1970). 

In a 105-day trial with 54 growing crossbred calves in Egypt, sun-dried, chopped bagasse replaced 50 or 100% of the barley straw portion of a diet containing 70% concentrate and 30% roughage. The urea dose simultaneously increased from zero to 1.5 and 3%, so bagasse replacement and urea supplementation were confounded. ADG was 0.683 kg in the barley-straw control, 0.859 kg with half of the roughage replaced and 0.933 kg with complete replacement; complete replacement corresponded to about 30% bagasse in the complete diet (Singer et al., 2019).

Steam pressure

In Mauritius, treatment of bagasse with high pressure steam (14 kg/cm² for 5 minutes) increased in sacco DM degradability from 28% to 60%. However, this early experiment used only a single bull (Wong You Cheong et al., 1974). In Colombia, steam-treated bagasse fed to zebu steers, receiving a supplement of either 2-3 kg per 100 kg live weight of Gliricidia sepium foliage, or 1-2 kg and ad libitum molasses/urea mixture (10% urea), resulted in ADG of 0.55-0.75 kg/day (Osorio, 1990). Steam-pressure treatment can increase bagasse digestibility and feeding value, but excessive inclusion of the treated product may still depress intake. In cattle trials reported in Florida, ADG increased from 1.10 to 1.40 kg/day as steam-pressure-treated bagasse rose from 0 to 30% of diet dry matter, then decreased at 46%. DM intake at 32% treated bagasse was twice that at 56% (Pate, 1982).

Three related experiments were conducted in Colombia. Steam treatment at 10-17 atmospheres and 180-200°C for 5-7 minutes produced a bagasse-based diet that supported ADG of 0.55-0.75 kg/day in 24 commercial Zebu steers supplemented with Gliricidia sepium, rice bran, poultry litter and urea-molasses. In a second experiment with 40 steers, ADG were 0.56-0.64 kg/day with steam-treated bagasse and 0.30 kg/day when the steamed bagasse received a subsequent 3% anhydrous-ammonia treatment. In a comparison using two cattle, 24-hour DM degradability was 14% for raw bagasse, 20% for steam-ammonia-treated bagasse and 31% for steam-treated bagasse (Osorio, 1990).

Steam-pressure-hydrolysed pith bagasse was tested in a 140-day trial with 24 young crossbred beef cattle in southwestern Iran. The pith replaced barley at 0, 11, 22 or 33% of the complete diet, while the amount of wheat straw also decreased. ADG was 1.07, 0.98, 0.86 and 0.77 kg/day, respectively; the 33% diet gave a lower gain and poorer feed conversion than the control, while most carcass traits were not significantly affected (Sabbagh Zade et al., 2009).

Alkali, urea, and ammoniation treatments

In a study with four Brahman × Thai native cattle in Thailand, untreated bagasse offered ad libitum with concentrate resulted in a lower total DM intake than rice straw (4.1 vs. 5.8 kg/day). Treating bagasse for at least 14 days with 4% urea or with 2% urea plus 2% calcium hydroxide increased total intake to about 5.1–5.2 kg/day. NDF digestibility increased from 47.1% for untreated bagasse to 57.4% with urea and 65.6% with urea plus calcium hydroxide (Gunun et al., 2016). In a in situ experiment with three Holstein steers conducted in Minas Gerais, Brazil, 4% anhydrous ammonia increased the effective degradability of bagasse DM, whereas 2.5% sodium sulfide (Na2S) alone did not (Pires et al., 2004).

Buffaloes

Ground, dried bagasse completely replaced barley straw in one lactating buffalo trial and gave favourable digestibility and milk responses, while chemically treated bagasse pith improved digestibility and liveweight gain in one older calf trial. 

In Egypt, 55 lactating buffaloes received diets containing 60% concentrate and 40% roughage. Bagasse collected from cane-juice shops was dried on the floor and hammer-milled to 3–5 mm, then replaced barley straw at 0, 10, 20, 30 or 40% of diet dry matter. DM digestibility increased from 60.1% in the control to 70.5% with complete replacement of barley straw. Milk yield increased from 7.12 to 8.08 kg/day and 4% fat-corrected milk from 9.15 to 10.77 kg/day, while milk constituent percentages were not affected (El-Mola et al., 2023).

In a 90-day Pakistani feeding comparison using pith obtained from a sugar mill in Faisalabad, chemically treated bagasse pith replaced wheat straw at 31% of a ration containing green maize and concentrate. The pith was first treated with 0.5% calcium hydroxide and then with 5% ammonia. DM digestibility was 65.2% with treated pith and 47.6% with wheat straw, while ADG was 0.75 and 0.63 kg, respectively (Firdos et al., 1989).

Sheep and goats

Sugarcane bagasse can provide structural fibre in complete diets for sheep and goats, but its feeding value depends strongly on the concentrate, nitrogen and other ingredients supplied with it.

Untreated bagasse

Untreated bagasse functions as a low-quality roughage in supplemented small ruminant diets. Increasing its proportion can reduce intake, while increasing concentrate in a bagasse-based ration can increase dry matter intake and digestibility. 

In an experiment with five sheep in Pernambuco State, Brazil, untreated bagasse was the sole roughage. Increasing concentrate from 40 to 80% of diet DM reduced bagasse from 60 to 20%. DM intake increased from 0.66 to 1.17 kg/day and DM digestibility from 57 to 66%, whereas NDF digestibility decreased from 50 to 41% (Silva et al., 2015). In an Indonesian experiment with fifteen male goats receiving isonitrogenous and nominally isoenergetic total mixed rations, increasing untreated bagasse from 15 to 35% of diet DM reduced DM intake from 806 to 605 g/day and CP intake from 99 to 76 g/day. CP digestibility, nitrogen retention, ruminal fermentation variables and estimated microbial nitrogen synthesis were not significantly affected (Ariyani et al., 2014).

Bagasse has also been evaluated with spineless cactus in diets for growing goats. In a 70-day trial with 24 male kids in Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil, a diet containing about 30% bagasse and 30% spineless cactus was compared with a diet containing 35% elephant-grass hay and 25% spineless cactus. Nutrient intake and ADG did not differ significantly, and DM and CP protein digestibility were higher with the bagasse–cactus diet, while elephant grass hay gave a higher hot carcass weight and yield (Campelo-Lima et al., 2022).

In an in situ experiment in Ceará State, Brazil, three Moxotó goats and three Morada Nova sheep received the same supplemented diet. The DM degradability of sun-dried bagasse was similar between species. Sheep had higher degradation rates and effective degradability: at an assumed passage rate of 2%/hour, effective DM degradability was 27.0% in sheep and 20.4% in goats, and NDF degradability was 22.6 and 19.1%, respectively (Gomes et al., 2013).

Physical processing

In a study with 12 adult rams and 12 adult male goats in Andhra Pradesh State, India, hammer-milled bagasse and steam-pelleted bagasse were offered ad libitum with 200 g concentrate per animal and day. Pelleting did not significantly change DM intake. It increased CP and energy digestibility but reduced the digestibility of several cell wall fractions, and did not improve digestible CP or Total Digestible Nutrient values. Sheep had the higher intake and digestibility of the complete ration, whereas difference-method estimates for bagasse alone favoured goats (Reddy et al., 1993).

Steam treatment

Steam-treated pith bagasse was tested in a 70-day trial with 40 three-month-old Arabi lambs in southwestern Iran. The pith replaced barley and represented 0, 11, 22 or 33% of the complete diet. ADG and feed conversion at 11 and 22% did not differ significantly from the control, whereas 33% reduced ADG from 267 to 226 g/day and worsened feed conversion from 5.24 to 6.50 (Hashemipour et al., 2009).

Chemical treatments

In Bahia State, Brazil, 24 young crossbred sheep were fed 50:50 bagasse-to-concentrate diets in which the bagasse was treated for 10 hours with 0, 0.75, 1.5 or 2.25% calcium oxide (CaO) on a fresh matter basis. DM and nutrient intake were not affected. ADG increased from 195 g with untreated bagasse to about 228–230 g at 1.5–2.25% CaO, but feed conversion and the digestibility of DM, CP and ADF did not improve. NDF digestibility showed a quadratic response and was highest at 0.75% CaO (Murta et al., 2011).

In a 74-day experiment with 34 growing Santa Inês wethers in Minas Gerais, Brazil, 50:50 forage-to-concentrate diets contained either fresh sugarcane with urea, dehydrated bagasse treated with 0.5% CaO, or bagasse ammoniated with 5% urea. DM intake and ADG were 0.984 kg and 0.155 kg/day with fresh sugarcane, 0.711 kg and 0.096 kg/day with CaO-treated bagasse, and 0.674 kg and 0.127 kg/day with ammoniated bagasse. Ammoniated bagasse gave a higher gain than the CaO-treated product, while both bagasse diets gave lower gains than the fresh cane diet (Filho et al., 2016).

In a 60-day experiment with nine male goats in Sudan, ammoniated bagasse was offered ad libitum with 100 g/day of Albizia lebbeck leaves, 100 g/day of wheat bran, or 50 g/day of each. Bagasse DM intake, the digestibility of  DM, CP and NDF, and nitrogen retention were higher with Albizia leaves than with wheat bran; the mixed supplement gave intermediate or similar responses (Balgees et al., 2009).

Biological treatments

In a 2 × 3 factorial trial in eastern Ethiopia, 36 yearling rams received 50:50 roughage-to-concentrate diets based on either sugarcane bagasse or rice husks; each roughage was untreated or fermented with Trichoderma viride or effective microorganisms. The diets were not nutritionally identical, and the preparation involved cultured inocula, added substrates, 21 days of fermentation and subsequent drying. Biological treatment increased intake, ADG and several carcass measures when results were pooled across both roughages. Bagasse diets gave lower dry matter intake (680 vs. 987 g/day), ADG (53 vs. 106 g/day) and hot carcass weight (9.1 vs. 12.4 kg) than rice-husk diets (Begna et al., 2023).

Other bagasse products

Industrially-produced pith bagasse 

In Iran, pith bagasse treated with steam pressure was found to have potential as an alternative feed for lambs and beef, and economically viable, though inclusion levels higher than 33% resulted in decreased feed conversion ratios and ADG (Sabbagh Zade et al., 2009; Hashemipour et al., 2009). Treatments with NaOH, calcium hydroxyde and ammonia (and various combinations of these treatments) were also found beneficial, resulting in higher digestibility, higher average day gain and lower costs when treated pith bagasse replaced wheat straw (Firdos et al., 1989).

Pressed cane stalks

When goats were offered pressed cane stalks, they avidly consumed the sugar-rich pith and discarded the lignified rind. In studies in the Dominican Republic, goats on a mixed diet of pressed stalk and fresh Gliricidia sepium foliage selected and apparently preferred the pith to the green foliage (Preston et al., 1987). It should be fed in a way that permits selection, e.g. by giving 200% of the expected DM intake. Because of the low nitrogen content, it should be supplemented with molasses-urea, rice polishings, cottonseed cake, or some other by-pass protein source, and a green foliage such as legume tree foliage.

Rabbits 

Rabbits require high fibre feeds and bagasse can be considered as good source of fibre (de Blas et al., 1999). Bagasse is fed ground to rabbits to provide structural fibre in a nutritionally balanced complete feed, while protein and digestible energy must be supplied by other ingredients. Untreated bagasse reduced digestibility or growth at inclusion rates between 9.5 and 19.1% in the available trials. Treated bagasse gave more favourable growth responses at 10–15%, although feed efficiency and other responses varied with the treatment. Within the range tested, particle size changed digestibility, caecal ammonia and caecotroph production more consistently than growth, whereas NaOH treatment did not improve the digestibility of bagasse. The evidence does not support a single recommended inclusion level.

Untreated bagasse

Untreated bagasse is poorly digestible and may reduce growth or feed efficiency when it replaces more digestible fibre sources. In a digestibility study conducted in São Paulo State, Brazil, ground bagasse represented 18 to 45% of the diets, resulting in DM digestibility decreasing from 74 to 59% (Teixeira et al., 2011).

In an experiment conducted in Egypt, with 50 growing rabbits, untreated bagasse replaced half of the berseem hay and represented 15% of the complete feed. Compared with the berseem hay control, bagasse reduced DM digestibility from 70.2 to 65.5%, final body weight from 1874 to 1805 g, and dressing percentage from 55.8 to 53.6%; whole-period feed conversion deteriorated from 3.8 to 4.3 g feed/g gain (Abdel-Aziz et al., 2014; Abdel-Aziz et al., 2015).

In another Egyptian experiment, complete feeds containing 9.5 or 19.1% untreated bagasse replaced respectively 50 or 100% of the berseem hay. The feeds were formulated to have similar CP, energy and crude fibre contents. Untreated bagasse reduced final body weight and ADG at both levels. At 19.1%, final body weight was 1955 versus 2145 g in controls, ADG was 22.0 versus 25.4 g/d, and feed conversion deteriorated from 3.258 to 3.523. Mortality did not differ significantly among treatments (El-Tahan et al., 2019).

Three companion publications report two related cohorts studied in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, with pelleted diets containing 18% bagasse ground to mean particle sizes of 0.231, 0.506, 0.616 or 0.833 mm. In 40 growing rabbits, feed intake, ADG, feed conversion, digestive-tract weights and carcass traits were not significantly affected by particle size (Vieira et al., 2003a; Gomes et al., 2004). In a second cohort of 32 rabbits, a report indicated that diets with mean particle sizes of 0.506 and 0.616 mm had the highest digestibility coefficients. Increasing particle size increased caecal ammonia, caecotroph production and the DM and CP supplied through caecotrophy, without changing caecotroph composition (Vieira et al., 2003a; Vieira et al., 2003b).

NaOH treatment

In a Brazilian digestibility study with 20 growing New Zealand White rabbits, untreated bagasse or bagasse treated with 2, 4 or 6% NaOH replaced 40% of a basal diet. NaOH did not significantly improve the digestibility of DM, CP, NDF, crude fibre or gross energy, while ADF digestibility decreased linearly as the dose increased (Pereira et al., 2008).

Enzyme and biological treatments

In the same Egyptian experiment cited above, adding a multi-enzyme product to the feed containing 9.5% bagasse restored final body weight and ADG to values not significantly different from the control and improved feed conversion. With 19.1% bagasse, enzyme supplementation improved some results but final weight and ADG remained lower than in controls (El-Tahan et al., 2019).

Biological treatment with Lactobacillus acidophilus, an exogenous enzyme preparation or both improved several digestibility and performance criteria relative to untreated bagasse in the experiment conducted in Egypt. The L. acidophilus-treated feed gave a DM digestibility of 78.9% and a final weight of 1979 g, compared with 65.5% and 1805 g for untreated bagasse (Abdel-Aziz et al., 2014).

Vinasse enrichment and autoclaving

Vinasse enrichment and autoclaving maintained growth when incorporated at 10–15% in balanced feeds, but feed efficiency and caecal or physiological responses varied with treatment. In a performance trial conducted in Minas Gerais State, Brazil, 0, 50, 100 or 150 g/kg of vinasse-enriched bagasse was included in complete feeds for growing rabbits. ADG did not differ significantly among feeds. However, at 150 g/kg, daily feed intake increased from 112.95 to 126.56 g and feed conversion deteriorated from 2.97 to 3.53 g feed/g gain relative to the control (Ferreira et al., 2015). 

In a later trial, dried or autoclaved bagasse, with or without vinasse, was included at 100 g/kg in isofibrous, isoenergetic and isoproteic pelleted feeds. The bagasse replaced portions of alfalfa hay and soybean meal. None of the four bagasse feeds differed from the control in whole period intake, ADG, feed conversion, slaughter weight or dressing percentage. Autoclaving at 120°C for 30 minutes improved feed conversion during the first three weeks, and vinasse improved it during the second three weeks, but neither effect was significant over the whole 42-day period. Autoclaving also reduced relative liver weight and increased caecal ammonia; vinasse and autoclaving changed in vitro fermentation variables (Ferreira et al., 2017).

Nutritional tables

Avg: average or predicted value; SD: standard deviation; Min: minimum value; Max: maximum value; Nb: number of values (samples) used

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 46.0 10.5 31.3 62.9 17  
Crude protein % DM 1.8 0.3 1.4 2.4 18  
Crude fibre % DM 45.9 3.7 35.8 50.3 19  
NDF % DM 86.9 6.1 72.6 91.9 8  
ADF % DM 58.4 2.4 55.1 62.2 8  
Lignin % DM 12.5 1.1 11.0 13.6 6  
Ether extract % DM 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.7 3  
Ash % DM 5.9 2.0 2.7 10.6 18  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 18.4         *
               
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Calcium g/kg DM 1.4 1.8 0.3 7.1 14  
Phosphorus g/kg DM 0.6 0.8 0.2 3.3 14  
Potassium g/kg DM 1.3 1.0 0.6 3.3 10  
Sodium g/kg DM 0.1   0.1 0.1 2  
Magnesium g/kg DM 0.8 0.3 0.4 1.4 13  
Zinc mg/kg DM 103       1  
Copper mg/kg DM 12       1  
Iron mg/kg DM 327       1  
               
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 49.7         *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 46.5         *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 8.6         *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 7.0         *
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=6%) % 30 11 17 36 3  
               
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 18.0         *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 3.3         *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Basile et al., 1990; CIRAD, 1991; Gowda et al., 2004; Hassoun, 2009; Keir et al., 1997; Onwuka et al., 1997; Pozy et al., 1996; Rivero et al., 2004; Suksombat, 2004

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:27

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 92.5 4.4 82.2 99.2 12  
Crude protein % DM 2.0 1.3 0.8 4.9 13  
Crude fibre % DM 46.4 7.8 30.2 61.3 13  
NDF % DM 81.7 9.4 68.7 91.3 9  
ADF % DM 53.0 9.9 40.2 66.6 9  
Lignin % DM 10.6 3.4 6.7 15.8 8  
Ether extract % DM 1.0 1.2 0.3 3.9 8  
Ash % DM 5.7 3.9 2.3 13.7 17  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 18.6   15.2 18.6 2 *
               
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Calcium g/kg DM 1.8 1.9 0.5 6.0 8  
Phosphorus g/kg DM 0.8 0.9 0.1 2.9 8  
Potassium g/kg DM 2.2 0.7 1.3 2.9 4  
Magnesium g/kg DM 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.8 4  
               
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
OM digestibility, ruminants % 45.5         *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 42.3         *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 7.9         *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 6.4         *
               
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 17.3         *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 3.2         *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

AFZ, 2011; CIRAD, 1991; Dixon, 1986; Elias, 1971; FUSAGx/CRAW, 2009; Krishna, 1985; Krishna, 1985; Mohsen et al., 2011; Ohlde et al., 1982; Parthasathy et al., 1982; Sunvold et al., 1995

Last updated on 26/11/2015 16:21:23

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 33.7 4.9 27.9 45.6 11  
Crude protein % DM 6.1 0.6 5.2 7.4 11  
Crude fibre % DM 50.9 2.4 45.0 53.4 11  
NDF % DM 87.7 2.4 81.0 89.6 11  
ADF % DM 64.9 3.2 58.5 68.8 11  
Lignin % DM 13.4 1.5 10.7 15.9 11  
Ash % DM 4.8 1.7 3.6 9.6 11  
               
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Calcium g/kg DM 0.9 0.2 0.7 1.5 11  
Phosphorus g/kg DM 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 11  
Potassium g/kg DM 1.7 0.4 1.1 2.2 11  
Magnesium g/kg DM 0.8 0.3 0.6 1.7 11  
               
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 41.8         *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

CIRAD, 1991

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:27

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 60.7   60.0 61.3 2  
Crude protein % DM 6.0   3.4 8.6 2  
NDF % DM 87.2   87.1 87.2 2  
ADF % DM 57.1   56.5 57.6 2  
Ether extract % DM 0.6   0.4 0.8 2  
Ash % DM 3.7   3.0 4.4 2  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 17.6   17.6 17.6 2  

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Suksombat, 2004

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:27

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 62.1   60.6 63.5 2  
Crude protein % DM 1.3   1.2 1.4 2  
NDF % DM 79.3   75.8 82.8 2  
ADF % DM 53.1   52.0 54.2 2  
Ether extract % DM 0.2   0.1 0.2 2  
Ash % DM 10.4   7.6 13.2 2  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 16.7   16.3 17.1 2  

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Suksombat, 2004

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:28

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 87.8 1
Crude protein % DM 1.7 1
Crude fibre % DM 45.1 1
Ether extract % DM 1.5 1
Ash % DM 2.5 1
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 19.2 *
 
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 3.9 1
Phosphorus g/kg DM 0.4 1
 
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 46.7 *
 
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 19.3 *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 3.7 *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Elias, 1971

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:28

References
References 
Datasheet citation 

Heuzé V., Tran G., Archimède H., 2026. Sugarcane bagasse. Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/559 Last updated on July 27, 2026, 18:32

English correction by Tim Smith (Animal Science consultant) and Hélène Thiollet (AFZ)