Feedipedia
Animal feed resources information system
Feedipedia
Feedipedia

Did you find the information you were looking for? Is it valuable to you? Feedipedia is encountering funding shortage. We need your help to keep providing reference-based feeding recommendations for your animals.
Would you consider donating? If yes, please click on the button Donate.

Any amount is the welcome. Even one cent is helpful to us!

Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium)

Datasheet

Description
Click on the "Nutritional aspects" tab for recommendations for ruminants, pigs, poultry, rabbits, horses, fish and crustaceans
Common names 

Gliricidia, Nicaraguan cocoashade, quick stick, Aaron's Rod, Mexican lilac, mother of cocoa, St. Vincent plum, tree of iron [English]; mataratón, mata ratón, madre de cacao, cacahuananche, madriado, madricacao, madriago, madero negro, kakawate [Spanish]; Cacahuanāntli [Nahuatl]; mãe do cacau, planta mãe do cacau [Portuguese]; gamal [Indonesian]; klérésédhé [Javanese]; শারঙ্গ [Bengali]; ശീമക്കൊന്ന [Malayalam]; kakawate [Philippines/Tagalog]; แคฝรั่ง [Thai]; 南洋櫻 [Chinese]

Synonyms 

Galedupa pungam Blanco, Gliricidia lambii Fernald, Gliricidia maculata (Kunth) Walp., Gliricidia maculata (Kunth) Walp. var. multijuga Micheli, Lonchocarpus maculatus (Kunth) DC., Lonchocarpus rosea (Mill.) DC., Lonchocarpus sepium (Jacq.) DC., Millettia luzonensis A. Gray, Millettia slendidissima sensu Naves, Robinia maculata Kunth, Robinia rosea Mill., Robinia sepium Jacq., Robinia variegata Schltdl. (USDA, 2009)

Related feed(s) 
Description 

Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp. is a perennial, deciduous or semi-evergreen, medium-sized legume tree, generally 2-15 m high, with a short trunk, an irregular or spreading crown and greyish-brown bark that may become fissured. It can be single-stemmed or multistemmed. Seed-grown plants usually develop a deeper root system than plants raised from stakes, which can be advantageous for dry-season forage production (Orwa et al., 2009; Wiersum et al., 1997; Smith et al., 1987). The leaves are alternate and pinnate, usually with 7-21 leaflets. The leaflets are thin, elliptic to lanceolate, generally dull green above and greyish-green beneath. The flowers are pink to lilac, or whitish-purple with age, and are borne in short axillary racemes. The pods are flat, 10-18 cm long, dehiscent at maturity, and usually contain 3-10 seeds (Orwa et al., 2009; Wiersum et al., 1997).

Gliricidia sepium is strongly outcrossing and insect-pollinated, notably by large bees. In seasonal climates it flowers mainly during the dry season after leaf fall, while in humid climates flowering may be more irregular. Pods ripen about 35-60 days after flowering and split explosively, dispersing seeds over short distances and favouring establishment on disturbed sites (Orwa et al., 2009; Wiersum et al., 1997).

Gliricidia is one of the major multipurpose tropical trees after leucaena. It is used as forage, live fence, shade tree, living stake for climbing crops, green manure, mulch, fuelwood, bee plant and reclamation tree. For livestock feeding, the usable products are mainly fresh leaves, leaves with tender stems, wilted forage, hay, silage and leaf meal. In the published studies compiled in a recent review, fresh leaves and leaves plus thin stems were the most frequent forms assessed, while silage, hay and leaf meal were less common but still nutritionally relevant (Wiersum et al., 1997; Silva et al., 2024).

Distribution 

Gliricidia sepium is native to the seasonally dry Pacific coast of Central America and Mexico. It has long been cultivated and naturalised in tropical Mexico, Central America and northern South America. It was introduced to the Caribbean and West Africa, taken to the Philippines in the early seventeenth century, and later reached Sri Lanka and other Asian countries including Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and India (Wiersum et al., 1997; Orwa et al., 2009). It is now widespread in the tropics and subtropics, especially in the Caribbean, tropical America, sub-Saharan Africa, South and South-East Asia and the Pacific. Its occurrence in a country does not mean that it is adapted to every local agroecological zone, and local biosafety and planting rules should be followed, particularly where tree species are introduced outside their native range (Orwa et al., 2009).

The species occurs from sea level to about 1200-1600 m altitude. It grows in climates with mean annual temperatures of about 15-30°C and annual rainfall from about 600 to 3500 mm, although its native range is mainly subhumid, with 900-1500 mm annual rainfall and a marked dry season. Temperatures below 15°C cause leaf fall and poor growth, and prolonged frost is not tolerated (Orwa et al., 2009; Wiersum et al., 1997). Gliricidia sepium is typical of early and middle successional vegetation on disturbed sites, including coastal sand dunes, river banks, floodplains and fallow land. It can establish on steep slopes and tolerates a wide range of soils, from sandy soils to alluvial clays, and from acid to slightly alkaline conditions. It is more tolerant of low fertility, waterlogging and marginal salinity than leucaena, but it performs best on free-draining, medium-textured soils and is not suited to very acid soils (Orwa et al., 2009; Wiersum et al., 1997; Alamu et al., 2023).

Processes 

Gliricidia is generally fed fresh or wilted in cut-and-carry systems, but it can also be conserved as hay, leaf meal or silage. Chopped forage can be ensiled alone or with energy-rich forages such as grasses, maize or cactus pear; fermentable carbohydrate sources may be needed because legume forages have high buffering capacity and limited soluble carbohydrates. Mixed cactus pear and gliricidia silages were chemically adequate, and adding at least 25% gliricidia improved aerobic stability while increasing crude protein and fibre fractions (Wiersum et al., 1997; Silva Brito et al., 2020).

Forage management 

Gliricidia can be propagated by seed or by cuttings. Seedlings are generally preferable for forage banks because they develop a deeper root system and are less easily uprooted, while large cuttings are useful for live fences, shade trees and living stakes. Fresh seed usually germinates well without pretreatment; nursery plants can be transplanted after about 10-12 weeks. Cuttings are commonly 0.5-2 m long and 3-6 cm in diameter, taken from mature branches and planted fresh (Wiersum et al., 1997; Smith et al., 1987).

Forage plots may be established at high densities, but the best density depends on site, rainfall and harvest system. Older guidance reported that leaf yield changed little between 5000 and 40,000 trees/ha. In north-eastern Brazil, however, planting densities above 20,000 plants/ha increased total fresh biomass, fresh leaf biomass and leaf dry matter per cutting without changing crude protein or fibre concentrations. In Yucatan, planting density between 10,000 and 20,000 plants/ha did not affect height, forage yield or crude protein concentration, while mixed fodder banks with Morus alba maintained yields similar to pure gliricidia (Wiersum et al., 1997; Castro Filho et al., 2016; Ramos-Trejo et al., 2020).

The first harvest can be made about 6-8 months after establishment from cuttings and 12-16 months after planting seedlings, but harvesting should be light during the first two years. Thereafter, cutting every 2-3 months during the rainy season and every 3-4 months during the dry season is generally recommended, provided regrowth has reached about 1-2 m. For dry-season fodder, trees should be cut about three months before the start of the dry season; otherwise they may shed leaves before they are needed (Wiersum et al., 1997).

Cutting interval is a compromise between yield and quality. In Trinidad, longer regrowth intervals increased gliricidia biomass yield, but younger material had the highest crude protein concentration and organic matter digestibility. Under coconut in Indonesia, leaf quality was determined more by cutting interval than by plant density; crude protein decreased from 3 to 12 weeks while dry matter, neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre increased. In the Sahel, a three-month pruning interval was recommended for marketable gliricidia fodder, as more frequent pruning reduced biomass and the proportion of green plants over time (Edwards et al., 2012a; Anis et al., 2016; Bayala et al., 2023).Cutting height is commonly between 0.5 and 2 m. Low pruning stimulates leafy regrowth in fodder banks and contour hedges, while higher pollarding is more suitable for shade, live fences or wood production. Repeated severe defoliation can weaken stands, particularly in dry environments, and long-term fodder banks may require rotation or replanting when mortality, termite damage or declining biomass become important (Orwa et al., 2009; Wiersum et al., 1997; Bayala et al., 2023).

Environmental impact 

Gliricidia sepium is a nitrogen-fixing tree that produces nutrient-rich litter and prunings with a low C/N ratio. Its leaves decompose rapidly, with a reported half-life of about 20 days, so the species is a useful green manure and mulch but must be supplied repeatedly if long-term soil organic matter build-up is sought (Wiersum et al., 1997; Alamu et al., 2023).

When used as mulch, biochar or intercrop, gliricidia has improved several indicators of soil fertility, including soil organic carbon, nitrogen, available phosphorus, pH, cation exchange capacity, soil organic matter, microbial activity and bulk density. In maize-based systems, gliricidia intercropping increased particulate organic carbon and, after repeated pruning inputs, soil carbon in the topsoil was higher than under sole maize (Alamu et al., 2023).

Gliricidia leaf biomass can partly replace mineral nitrogen fertiliser and reduce production costs for smallholders. By reducing reliance on synthetic fertiliser and by recycling nutrients through prunings, gliricidia systems may reduce the environmental burden associated with fertiliser manufacture and use, though responses depend on soil phosphorus, rainfall and the synchrony between litter decomposition and crop demand (Alamu et al., 2023).

In silvopastoral systems, gliricidia can add shade, fodder and biological nitrogen fixation. In a Brazilian signalgrass system, gliricidia had a high proportion of nitrogen derived from the atmosphere and was more oriented towards livestock forage production than Mimosa caesalpiniifolia, which produced more woody biomass. Other work reviewed by Alamu et al. reported that tree legumes such as gliricidia can promote nitrogen-cycling bacterial communities in the soil (Herrera et al., 2021; Alamu et al., 2023).

Gliricidia is also used in erosion control, live fencing, windbreaks, shade for perennial crops and reclamation of denuded land or Imperata-infested areas. Its light canopy allows some understorey growth, and its dry-season leaf fall can reduce transpiration. The species is light-demanding and has been described as a non-aggressive invader, but caution remains necessary when it is planted outside its natural range (Orwa et al., 2009; Wiersum et al., 1997; Alamu et al., 2023).

Gliricidia biochar has been investigated for improving soil physical properties and immobilising heavy metals, but this is a specific use that depends on feedstock, pyrolysis temperature and application rate. It should not be treated as equivalent to fresh mulch or prunings in routine forage systems (Alamu et al., 2023).

Nutritional aspects
Nutritional attributes 

Gliricidia foliage is mainly valued as a protein-rich tropical forage. Leaves and leafy twigs generally have high crude protein, moderate to high fibre and appreciable ash. The youngest leaves have the best nutritive value; with maturity, nitrogen and crude protein tend to fall while crude fibre, lignin and dry matter increase (Smith et al., 1987; Wiersum et al., 1997; Anis et al., 2016; Silva et al., 2024).

A systematic review of 135 analyses from 100 studies reported mean crude protein concentrations of about 225 g/kg DM in fresh leaves, 208 g/kg DM in leaves plus thin stems, 169 g/kg DM in silage, 194 g/kg DM in hay and 226 g/kg DM in leaf meal. Mean neutral detergent fibre concentrations were generally around 425-480 g/kg DM, with acid detergent fibre around 290-340 g/kg DM depending on the feed form. These values confirm the role of gliricidia as a protein forage rather than an energy-rich feed (Silva et al., 2024).

The differences between feed forms should not be overstated. Fresh leaves are usually the richest fraction because they contain little woody tissue, but hay, silage and leaf meal generally conserve the main nutritional characteristics when they are properly made. In the systematic review, crude protein, neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre were the main variables explaining variation in the dataset, but feed forms were not clearly separated by overall composition (Silva et al., 2024).

Mineral composition is characterised by high calcium and potassium and relatively low phosphorus and sodium, as is common in tropical legume browse. Older review data reported calcium mostly between 6 and 25 g/kg DM and phosphorus around 1.1-2.9 g/kg DM, while the systematic review reported mean calcium values around 11-14 g/kg DM and phosphorus around 2 g/kg DM in the forms where these minerals were analysed. Gliricidia should therefore not be considered a balanced mineral supplement (Smith et al., 1987; Topps, 1992; Silva et al., 2024).

Composition is affected by site, rainfall, plant density, plant part and harvest interval. In Brazilian semi-arid conditions, higher plant densities increased biomass production but did not change crude protein, neutral detergent fibre or acid detergent fibre. In Indonesia and Trinidad, extending the harvest interval increased dry matter yield or dry matter concentration but reduced crude protein and increased fibre fractions, illustrating the usual trade-off between quantity and quality (Castro Filho et al., 2016; Anis et al., 2016; Edwards et al., 2012a).

Gliricidia used for silage has higher buffering capacity than many carbohydrate-rich forages. In cactus pear mixtures, increasing gliricidia raised crude protein, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre, lignin and aerobic stability, while cactus pear supplied soluble carbohydrates useful for fermentation. Such mixtures can be useful where a high-moisture energy forage must be balanced with a drier protein forage (Silva Brito et al., 2020).

Potential constraints 

Antinutritional factors and palatability

Gliricidia, which means "mouse killer" in Latin, contains several secondary metabolites and potential antinutritional factors, including coumarin and related phenolic compounds, condensed tannins, flavonols, total phenols, cyanogenic compounds, nitrate, pinitol, canavanine and unidentified alkaloids. Concentrations are variable and are not routinely measured. A recent review characterised gliricidia as generally low in condensed tannins and total phenolic compounds, but coumarin can vary strongly between genotypes and may contribute to poor acceptability (McSweeney et al., 2002; Silva et al., 2024). Phenolic compounds and tannins can bind proteins and reduce digestibility when present at high concentrations. In gliricidia, this risk is usually lower than with more tanniniferous browse species, but fibre-bound nitrogen, lignin and phenolic-protein complexes may still reduce the nutritional value of mature or poorly conserved material (McSweeney et al., 2002; Silva et al., 2024).

Toxicity is clearer in non-ruminants than in ruminants. Gliricidia leaves, bark, seeds and roots have been used traditionally as rodenticide or pesticide after fermentation, and non-ruminants have shown signs of poisoning in some reports. Toxicity to horses has been reported but is not well confirmed. Ruminants generally tolerate gliricidia under practical feeding conditions, probably because rumen microorganisms can transform or detoxify part of the secondary compounds, but high inclusion rates and long-term sole feeding should still be used with caution (Smith et al., 1987; Wiersum et al., 1997; McSweeney et al., 2002).

The main practical constraint is variable palatability. Animals unfamiliar with gliricidia may initially refuse the fresh foliage, probably because of odour and secondary compounds, but they can adapt after gradual exposure. Wilting for one day or making silage can improve acceptance in some situations (Wiersum et al., 1997; Orwa et al., 2009; Silva et al., 2024).

Nitrate accumulation

Nitrate accumulation has been reported at the beginning of the rainy season, and cyanogenic compounds have also been detected. These findings support gradual introduction, avoidance of sudden high intakes of young lush foliage, and use of gliricidia as a supplement or mixed forage rather than as the only feed, especially where local experience with the tree is limited (Smith et al., 1987; McSweeney et al., 2002).

Allelopathic effectss

Gliricidia leaf extracts and fresh or dried leaf residues may have short-lived allelopathic effects linked to phenolic acids. When used as mulch before sowing crops, these effects can be reduced by applying the mulch at least one week before planting (Wiersum et al., 1997).

Ruminants 

Dairy cattle

In dairy cows, Gliricidia sepium products are best considered as local protein supplements for grass-, straw- or crop-residue-based diets rather than as complete feeds. Fresh or wilted foliage can partly replace green forage without depressing intake or milk yield when inclusion is moderate. Dried leaf meal, blocks, pellets and concentrate mixtures are more versatile, but responses depend strongly on the accompanying energy source, the basal forage and the replacement rate. The most consistent results were obtained when gliricidia leaf meal was mixed with other supplements, such as cottonseed cake, maize bran, coconut poonac or rice bran. High inclusion in pellets, or complete replacement of a farm diet, was less reliable and could reduce milk yield or milk fat. Practical use should therefore be gradual, preferably with wilted or dried material, and diets should remain balanced for energy, minerals and fibre.

Fresh foliage

In coastal lowland Kenya, fresh Gliricidia sepium leaves and tender twigs were offered at 2.1 kg dry matter (DM)/day as a nitrogen supplement to mid-lactation Jersey cows fed Napier grass, maize bran and minerals. Total DM intake was not changed, and milk yield increased from 4.0 to 4.8 kg/day, though Clitoria ternatea and Mucuna pruriens gave similar or higher responses. Apparent DM and organic matter (OM) digestibilities were 60.3% and 58.8%, while in vitro OM digestibility of gliricidia was 53.5%. Gliricidia contained more tannins than the other legumes, but the level remained below the critical threshold cited by the authors and cows remained healthy throughout the trial (Juma et al., 2006).

Wilted foliage

In Tamil Nadu, India, wilted Gliricidia sepium leaves were offered at 0.70 kg DM/day as a 15% replacement for Bajra-Napier hybrid grass in mid-lactation Jersey x Red Sindhi cows. DM intake and milk yield were not significantly affected (7.41 vs 7.30 kg DM/day and 6.72 vs 6.90 kg milk/day), and milk fat, solid non-fat, protein and lactose were unchanged. The leaves were wilted for 6 h in the shade, and the silvipasture source produced 8.33 kg edible fresh biomass/tree over four harvests per year (Gunasekaran et al., 2017).

Dried leaf meal

In Morogoro, Tanzania, dried Gliricidia sepium leaf meal partly replaced cottonseed cake in Napier grass-based diets for crossbred dairy cows. A diet containing 23.4% Gliricidia leaf meal with reduced cottonseed cake maintained milk yield close to the cottonseed cake control (9.36 vs 9.46 kg/day), whereas the 18.0% and 39.7% Gliricidia diets gave lower yields. Gliricidia leaf meal had higher DM degradability than cottonseed cake (58.3% vs 55.1%), higher 48 h degradability (65.2% vs 59.8%) and higher metabolisable energy (ME) (10.0 vs 9.0 MJ/kg DM). Milk total solids, butterfat and protein were not affected, and the best gross margin was obtained with partial substitution (Shem et al., 2003).

In Uganda, dried Gliricidia sepium leaf meal was included at 3-9% of the diet in a maize bran and cottonseed cake supplement for Friesian cows fed banana-peeling diets. The trial did not isolate the effect of gliricidia, but the supplemented diets supported milk yields of 10.2-11.4 kg/day and did not affect live weight change. DM intake increased with 40% or 60% banana peelings. Milk fat and fat-corrected milk were lower at high banana-peeling levels, whereas milk protein and ash were unchanged. Blood metabolites were mostly adequate; potassium decreased at 60% banana peelings, phosphorus increased after banana peelings were included, and non-esterified fatty acids were lower at 40% and 60% (Nambi-Kasozi et al., 2014).

In Sri Lanka, Gliricidia sepium leaf meal blocks containing 75% leaf meal and coconut poonac, with or without rice bran, were fed to indigenous x Sahiwal cows in late lactation during drought. Total DM intake increased from 5.8 kg/day in the control to 8.6-8.7 kg/day with the blocks, and live weight gain was numerically higher. The block containing rice bran gave the highest milk yield (2.40 L/day), but the response was limited because cows were in late lactation. The blocks were rapidly consumed after being broken and mixed with water, and the rice bran formulation was considered to give the better nitrogen and energy balance (Somasiri et al., 2011).

In Sri Lanka, dried and chopped Gliricidia sepium leaves were pelleted with Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) for Friesian cows. The pellet containing 75% gliricidia and 25% Guinea grass slightly increased milk yield when it replaced 20% or 40% of the farm diet, but higher replacement rates, lower-gliricidia pellets and pure Guinea grass pellets reduced milk yield; complete replacement was unsuitable for high-yielding cows. Digestibility in heifers increased with gliricidia proportion, from 36.0% with pure Guinea grass to 52.5% with the 75% gliricidia pellet. Milk fat was maintained only with the 75% gliricidia pellet, while other milk constituents were not affected. Tannins and other antinutritional factors were possible constraints at high gliricidia inclusion, but the low protein and high fibre value of pure Guinea grass was also limiting (Munasinghe et al., 2021).

In Indonesia, 15% ground dried Gliricidia sepium leaves replaced part of the pollard, soyabean meal and rice bran in a concentrate fed to pregnant dairy cows entering lactation. Feed intake, DM and OM digestibility, feed conversion and milk production over the first three months of lactation were not significantly affected; total milk production was 859.1 L/head with gliricidia and 887.6 L/head in the control. DM digestibility was 56.7% with gliricidia and 58.3% in the control, and OM digestibility was 58.1% and 59.2%, respectively. Cow weight gain and calf birth weight were numerically higher, and the authors proposed 15% replacement in concentrate to reduce feed cost without impairing performance (Widiawati et al., 2019).

Beef cattle and heifers

Gliricidia products are best used in beef cattle as local protein supplements for grass-, stover-, straw- or silage-based diets, rather than as sole forages. Fresh foliage can improve growth on low-quality roughages, but it may partly replace basal forage intake and cattle need adaptation. Dried leaf meal and complete-feed mixtures are more reliable when they are combined with fermentable energy sources such as maize, molasses or cassava; moderate inclusion generally performed better than high inclusion. In silvopastoral systems, gliricidia can improve cattle performance when it does not compete excessively with grass, but cattle still select grass preferentially and browsing is seasonal. Diets containing gliricidia with tannin- and saponin-containing pods can reduce methane emission intensity, although effects on digestibility and growth depend on the whole diet. Familiarisation to Gliricidia sepium is required so that cattle can eat it readily and benefit from its high protein content (Wiersum et al., 1997).

Fresh and wilted foliage

In coastal Kenya, fresh gliricidia was offered to crossbred steers fed Napier grass at incremental levels up to 30 g DM/kg metabolic body weight. Gliricidia increased rumen ammonia and average daily gain (ADG) from 306 to 478 g/day, but it also displaced Napier grass intake and did not improve apparent digestibility. It was therefore useful as a nitrogen supplement to a low-nitrogen grass, but not as a simple intake stimulant (Abdulrazak et al., 1996). Fresh gliricidia was also tested with maize stover plus maize bran. Increasing gliricidia improved total DM intake, rumen ammonia and liveweight gain, although stover intake fell at higher supplementation. In a comparison with leucaena, gliricidia gave similar responses; gains reached 695 g/day at 30 g DM/kg metabolic body weight. Gliricidia was a practical alternative to leucaena for supplementing crop residues during feed scarcity (Abdulrazak et al., 1997).

In South Sulawesi, Indonesia, fresh or overnight-wilted gliricidia leaves replaced elephant grass (Cenchrus purpureus) in diets for growing female Bali cattle. Increasing gliricidia from 15 to 45% of diet DM increased intake, DM digestibility, ADG from 0.16 to 0.39 kg/day and feed efficiency. The results support using gliricidia leaves as a low-cost supplement for cattle fed elephant grass, but do not define the upper safe level (Rusdy et al., 2019). In Central Sulawesi, fresh chopped gliricidia leaf and young stem were mixed 1:1 on a DM basis with sun-dried cassava tuber and offered to Ongole bulls fed maize stover and Bali bulls fed elephant grass. Supplementation up to 1.6% liveweight/day increased total DM intake, liveweight gain and income over feed cost; maximum gains were 0.69 and 0.46 kg/day, respectively. Basal forage intake decreased, showing substitution rather than additive intake (Marsetyo et al., 2021).

In Venezuela, weaned Brahman x Holstein cattle fed sorghum silage supplemented with urea and minerals received fresh gliricidia, concentrate or both. Gliricidia intake was below the target set for concentrate, but liveweight gain increased significantly and responses per 100 g supplement were similar to concentrate. Low levels of fresh gliricidia could therefore replace part of purchased concentrate for cattle on sorghum silage (Zamora et al., 1994).

In Timor-Leste, male growing Bali cattle were fed fermented rice straw, rice bran, gliricidia and leucaena in five combinations. Ration intake was not significantly changed, but body weight gain and feed conversion differed between treatments. The best growth was obtained with the diet containing 35% gliricidia, 15% leucaena, 50% fermented rice straw and 5% rice bran, indicating that gliricidia can be used with other local legumes and rice by-products (Code et al., 2021).

Dried leaf meal

In Venezuela, crossbred heifers grazing Tanner grass received either no supplement, a commercial concentrate or a farm-made supplement containing dehydrated gliricidia leaf meal, maize meal and molasses. The gliricidia supplement increased ADG relative to grazing alone (556 vs 457 g/day) and advanced puberty by about two months, with no significant difference in puberty weight. The response was close to that obtained with the commercial concentrate (Gonzalez et al., 2003).

In Yogyakarta, Indonesia, dried gliricidia leaf meal replaced copra meal or soybean hulls in cassava-based concentrates for Ongole bulls under smallholder conditions. Supplements were offered at 1% liveweight/day. Current feeding gave 0.31 kg/day ADG, while gliricidia-containing concentrates gave 0.61-0.62 kg/day and doubled income over feed cost. Gliricidia leaf meal was therefore a usable local protein source in cassava concentrates, though the non-gliricidia supplement gave the highest ADG (Winarti et al., 2022). In West Timor, male Bali cattle were fed complete feeds containing dried and ground gliricidia at 10, 20 or 31% of diet DM. DM and OM intakes and nutrient digestibilities were similar, but the 20% gliricidia ration gave the highest daily ADG (0.99 kg/day) and the best feed conversion. Increasing gliricidia to 31% did not improve performance, probably because protein and energy supply became less balanced (Tahuk et al., 2022). In another study the medium-gliricidia ration improved meat percentage and meat:bone ratio compared with the lower-gliricidia ration, while slaughter weight, carcass weight, carcass percentage, fat percentage, non-carcass weight and most meat-quality traits were unchanged. Moderate dried gliricidia in a balanced complete feed improved carcass composition more than higher inclusion (Tahuk et al., 2020). In Bali, complete rations for indigenous Bali cattle combined rice straw, gliricidia, elephant grass, calliandra and concentrate. Increasing gliricidia with rice straw changed rumen fermentation; total volatile fatty acids and propionic acid increased, and microbial protein synthesis was highest with 20% rice straw and 25% gliricidia. The study supports gliricidia as a rumen-degradable protein source in straw-based rations, provided fibre and concentrate are kept in balance (Suryani et al., 2019).

Effect on methane production

In Mexico, crossbred heifers received diets in which Brachiaria brizantha was partly replaced by a dried and ground mixture of gliricidia foliage and Enterolobium cyclocarpum pods. Dry matter intake and rumen microbial populations were not affected. Inclusion at 15-30% reduced methane per unit of weight gain and increased digestible crude protein intake, but fibre digestibility decreased as legume-pod inclusion rose. The tannins and saponins contributed to the methane-mitigation response (Molina-Botero et al., 2019a). In a longer Mexican trial, crossbred heifers were fed for 80 days with or without 15% of the same gliricidia-Enterolobium mixture. Methane per unit of DM intake, digestible DM intake, digestible crude protein and annual gain decreased, while total daily methane, volatile fatty acids and the main microbial groups were little affected. The mitigation response persisted over time, but it was not explained by a general improvement in digestibility (Molina-Botero et al., 2019b). In vitro work using material collected in Mexico compared Brachiaria brizantha alone or mixed with gliricidia and Enterolobium pods. Gliricidia alone at 15% maintained methane per degraded DM close to grass alone, whereas mixtures including pods increased fermentation end-products and, in some mixtures, methane production. The test confirms that gliricidia and pods cannot be treated as equivalent methane-mitigation feeds and that combinations must be tested before field recommendation (Molina-Botero et al., 2020).

Silvopastoral systems

In Pernambuco, Brazil, signal grass monoculture was compared with silvopastures containing gliricidia or Mimosa caesalpiniifolia over four years. ADG was similar across systems, but gain per hectare tended to be lower in silvopastures, mainly because of competition between trees and grass, especially under mimosa. Gliricidia did not clearly improve beef output per area at this stage, but was less limiting than mimosa (Santos et al., 2019). In the same region, a later two-year evaluation found a stronger positive effect of the gliricidia system. ADG was 0.77 kg/day in signal grass-gliricidia, compared with 0.56 kg/day in signal grass monoculture and 0.23 kg/day with mimosa. Total gain per area followed the same order. The tree species was decisive: gliricidia enhanced livestock performance, whereas mimosa competed too strongly with the grass (Gomes da Silva et al., 2021). In the Brazilian silvopasture experiment, faecal carbon isotopes showed that cattle mainly selected signal grass rather than tree legumes, though gliricidia intake increased during the dry period. In situ work showed that gliricidia improved DM digestibility of signal grass mixtures, with values above 80% at high gliricidia inclusion after 48-96 h incubation. The practical value of gliricidia in silvopastures therefore depends on grazing access, season and cattle acceptance (Costa et al., 2021).

Sheep

Gliricidia products gave variable responses in sheep, depending on the product, processing, basal forage and inclusion level. The best results were obtained when gliricidia complemented low-quality grass, straw or cassava-based diets as a moderate protein forage, improving intake, nitrogen supply, digestibility or growth. Fresh or wilted leaves were generally better accepted than dried leaves, although dried leaf supplements were useful when inclusion was controlled. Ensiling with grass or cassava improved preservation and was effective when it corrected nitrogen or fermentable carbohydrate deficiencies. Poorer responses occurred when gliricidia replaced high-quality protein sources, formed half of an unbalanced roughage diet, or was used without sufficient adaptation. Tannins, odour and other secondary compounds may explain some reductions in palatability, fibre digestibility or growth, but low-tannin gliricidia did not consistently reduce methane. Gliricidia is therefore best considered as a complementary forage rather than a stand-alone concentrate replacement; moderate inclusion, previous adaptation, and adequate fermentable energy are essential.

Fresh or wilted foliage

In a multi-country comparison including Colombia, Costa Rica, Nigeria, Sri Lanka and Indonesia, sheep and goats distinguished between gliricidia provenances and often preferred local material. However, provenance had little consistent effect on intake, digestibility or live-weight gain when animals had no choice, suggesting that adaptation and biomass yield mattered more than provenance for feeding value (Stewart et al., 1998).

In Nigeria, fresh, wilted and dried gliricidia leaves were compared as supplements to Panicum maximum in West African Dwarf sheep. Fresh and wilted leaves were consumed better than dried leaves, and total intake increased as fresh or wilted supplementation rose. The authors recommended fresh or wilted leaves at 20-30% of the daily forage allowance (Smith et al., 1995).

In Indonesia, fresh gliricidia leaves fed as a sole forage to ram lambs had moderate intake and digestibility. Among the tree legumes tested, gliricidia had the lowest soluble phenolic and soluble proanthocyanidin concentrations, and it gave higher dry matter digestibility and digestible energy than calliandra or falcataria. Digestible energy was about 12.6 MJ/kg dry matter (Merkel et al., 1999b). Fresh gliricidia leaves supplied 25 or 50% of dietary CP in concentrate-based rations for growing lambs. Compared with the grass-control diet, gliricidia reduced ADG and gain efficiency despite similar DM intake. DM and nitrogen digestibilities declined as tree-leaf inclusion increased, suggesting protein binding by tannins and other phenolics (Merkel et al., 1999a).

In Guadeloupe, fresh gliricidia leaves supplemented pangola (Digitaria decumbens) hay in Black-belly rams. Total DM intake increased as gliricidia increased, CP digestibility and duodenal nitrogen flows improved, and hay substitution remained moderate. Fibre digestibility decreased and no positive associative effect with pangola hay was observed (Archimède et al., 2001). Green banana fruits and fresh gliricidia forage replaced imported maize grain and soybean meal in hay-based diets for Martinik lambs. High gliricidia supply increased intake and supported higher ADG than the control, whereas the lower level depressed gain and feed conversion. Adult rams maintained positive nitrogen balance, but CP digestibility was lower than with soybean meal (Archimède et al., 2010).

In Mexico, a diet containing 50% fresh gliricidia leaves and 50% Taiwan grass (Pennisetum purpureum) did not improve Pelibuey sheep performance. Total DM intake was lower than with grass alone, protein intake increased, and all sheep lost weight. The authors related the poor response to high foliage inclusion and possible toxic compounds (Grande et al., 2005).

In Nigeria, wilted gliricidia foliage replaced 25% of Panicum maximum in diets for West African Dwarf sheep. Gliricidia increased supplement and CP intakes, but growth remained low and was not better than with moringa or cassava leaves. Carcass traits and organ weights were not significantly changed by the type of foliage supplement (Fadiyimu et al., 2016). Wilted gliricidia fodder supplemented a basal diet of Panicum maximum and cassava peels in West African Dwarf rams. Gliricidia increased total intake, DM digestibility, CP digestibility and nitrogen retention compared with the basal diet alone, though the moringa-gliricidia mixture gave the best overall intake and nitrogen use (Kikelomo, 2014). Gliricidia fodder was fed with urea-treated cassava peels at 10, 20 or 30% of the diet in West African Dwarf rams. Feed intake was unchanged, but weight gain and feed conversion improved compared with urea-treated cassava peels alone. Most haematological variables remained within normal ranges, and 30% gliricidia gave the best overall response. Urea treatment reduced cassava-peel hydrocyanic acid content (Kikelomo et al., 2023). Diets containing 20% wilted gliricidia foliage, 50% guinea grass and 30% concentrate were supplemented with neem leaf meal in West African Dwarf ewe-lambs. Adding neem increased nitrogen intake and retention, but the trial did not include a diet without gliricidia, so it mainly shows that gliricidia can be part of a nitrogen-efficient mixed forage-concentrate diet (Shegun et al., 2017).

Dried leaves, hay and leaf meal

In Uganda, dried gliricidia leaves supplemented dried KW4 elephant grass (Cenchrus purpureus) in mature rams. Gliricidia reduced grass intake but did not significantly change total dry matter intake. Digestibility, body-weight gain and nitrogen retention improved, with the best response at 8 g dry matter/kg live weight/day; higher supplementation caused greater substitution of the basal forage (Mpairwe et al., 1998).

In Mexico, sun-dried gliricidia was included at 10, 20 or 30% in stargrass (Cynodon nlemfuensis) hay diets for Pelibuey sheep. DM, OM and CP intakes and digestibilities increased linearly, while rumen DM digestion of stargrass was not depressed. Microbial nitrogen supply tended to increase at 30% gliricidia (Ramirez-Aviles et al., 1998). In Mexico, gliricidia hay was included at 10, 20 or 30% in Buffel grass hay diets for hair sheep lambs. DM intake and DM and OM digestibilities were not affected. CP intake and digestibility increased, but NDF and ADF digestibilities declined as gliricidia increased. Tannins were not analysed (Avilés-Nieto et al., 2013). Dried and ground gliricidia leaves replaced 50% of soybean meal protein in isoproteic rations for growing Pelibuey x Blackbelly lambs. Gliricidia reduced DM intake, lowered ADG and impaired feed conversion. A mixed Guazuma-gliricidia treatment was intermediate, whereas Guazuma alone maintained performance. Unidentified secondary compounds were suspected as the main limitation (Castrejón-Pineda et al., 2016).

In Guadeloupe, sun-dried gliricidia leaves were ground and pelleted before being fed with Dichanthium hay to Texel and Blackbelly sheep. Intake and nitrogen balance increased, OM digestibility was not significantly changed, and NDF digestibility decreased. Methane per digestible OM intake was not significantly reduced by gliricidia, unlike more tannin-rich leucaena or cassava leaf pellets (Archimède et al., 2015). In the companion rumen-microbiology work in Guadeloupe, gliricidia pellets had lower condensed tannin concentration than the leucaena and cassava leaf pellets tested. In vitro, gliricidia had less effect on methane and volatile fatty acids than the more tannin-rich plants. In vivo, tannin-rich plant pellets did not affect protozoa numbers or Fibrobacter succinogenes (Rira et al., 2015).

In Japan and the Philippines, gliricidia leaf meal supplemented ammoniated rice straw in sheep. It increased total DM intake, digestibility except for fibre, nitrogen balance, microbial nitrogen yield and rumen outflow rate without reducing straw intake. Growth improved from 19.3 g/day with straw alone to 33.9 g/day with gliricidia, close to leucaena (Orden et al., 2000).

In Indonesia, naturally infected sheep received withered gliricidia leaves as 30 or 50% of forage intake, or 60 g/head/day of gliricidia leaf powder, for 21 days. Fresh withered leaves reduced faecal egg counts more than leaf powder during treatment, while most packed cell volume values remained normal. Haemonchus contortus was the dominant larva recovered (Sawitri et al., 2023).

“Forage salt”

In Brazil, gliricidia hay was mixed with mineral salt to make “forage salt” containing 93-99% hay and offered to confined Santa Ines crossbred lambs fed Tifton-85 hay. DM, OM and NDF intakes were not affected, but CP intake, ADG and feed conversion improved; the 99% gliricidia forage salt gave the highest gain. Gliricidia forage salt containing did not alter fasting slaughter weight, hot or cold carcass weight, carcass yield, chilling losses or red and white viscera weights. The product improved performance in the companion trial without detectable adverse effects on carcass and non-carcass traits (Cirne et al., 2012; Cirne et al., 2013).

Silage

In Brazil, gliricidia silage replaced part or all of the concentrate in maize-silage-based diets for Santa Ines lambs, at up to 40% as fed. Replacing concentrate with gliricidia silage did not significantly alter total rumen ciliate density or the main protozoal genera, indicating no clear defaunating effect under these conditions (Martinele et al., 2014). Gliricidia was ensiled with cassava biomass at 0, 20, 40 or 60% cassava and fed as 70% of total mixed rations for Santa Ines crossbred lambs. Cassava improved fermentation, and 60% cassava in the silage gave the clearest increases in intake, ADG, carcass weights and commercial cut weights, without changing feeding behaviour (Oliveira et al., 2018).

In Cuba, king grass (Cenchrus purpureus) was ensiled alone or with gliricidia foliage and fed to Pelibuey lambs. The gliricidia-king grass silage increased DM intake, DM digestibility, nitrogen intake, nitrogen digestibility and nitrogen retention compared with king grass silage alone. Mixed grass-legume silage was therefore more useful than grass silage where nitrogen was limiting (Santana et al., 2019).

Goats

Gliricidia sepium is mainly a protein-rich forage supplement for goats, not a reliable sole feed. Responses are best when it is offered as whole or wilted foliage with grasses or crop residues, combined with energy-rich feeds such as cassava peels, molasses or cereal concentrates, or used at moderate levels in balanced complete diets. Fresh gliricidia can be less readily selected than leucaena or other legumes, and intake depends on previous exposure, wilting, molasses and the physical form offered. Inclusion near 30-40% of forage DM has often improved growth, digestibility or nitrogen balance on poor grass diets, whereas very high or sole gliricidia feeding is less consistent. Drying or hay-making can improve intake and protein use, but gliricidia leaf meal may be less efficient than cassava or leucaena leaf meal. In dairy goats, gliricidia can replace conventional forage when diets are balanced with adequate energy and concentrates, generally maintaining milk yield and quality rather than markedly increasing them.

Fresh and wilted foliage

In Lao PDR, six growing local goats were offered gliricidia foliage hung above the trough, placed in the trough or stripped as leaves. Whole foliage gave higher DM intake and DM digestibility than leaves alone; DM digestibility was 75.1% when foliage was hung, 72.3% in the trough and 50.3% with leaves only. Gliricidia should be offered with petioles and stems attached (Keopaseuht et al., 2004). Growing goats fed Guinea grass with wilted gliricidia leaves had similar DM and OM intake to grass-fed goats, but CP intake increased. The best result was obtained with 30% of energy from gliricidia, with ADG 43 g/day versus 22 g/day without gliricidia and DM digestibility 53.3% versus 47.1% (Phimphachanhvongsod et al., 2002).

In Samoa, mature goats fed maize stover plus 50% gliricidia had higher DM intake and nutrient digestibility than goats fed urea-treated maize stover, though gliricidia was initially less readily eaten than erythrina or leucaena. Molasses improved gliricidia intake and CP and OM digestibility. Gliricidia is useful with maize stover, but acceptance may require adaptation or molasses (Aregheore et al., 2004a; Aregheore et al., 2004b).

In Nigeria, West African Dwarf bucks were fed fresh gliricidia, Panicum maximum and sun-dried cassava peels in several combinations. The diet containing 35% gliricidia, 35% Panicum and 30% cassava peels gave the highest ADG, while 70% gliricidia plus 30% cassava peels gave the highest DM digestibility. Sole gliricidia was less digestible and less efficient than mixed diets (Ifut, 1992).

In Indonesia, Kacang goats fed Napier grass supplemented with gliricidia foliage at about 15% of Napier grass DM intake gained 20 g/day, whereas unsupplemented goats lost 1 g/day. Total DM intake and digestibility were not improved because gliricidia largely replaced grass intake, but small amounts of tree-legume foliage corrected the poor growth obtained on grass alone (Van Eys et al., 1986). Old Guinea grass supplemented with 40% fresh gliricidia supported higher DM intake, CP intake, DM digestibility, CP digestibility, NDF digestibility and nitrogen retention than old grass alone. Nitrogen retention changed from a negative value on old grass to 67.9% of ingested nitrogen with gliricidia, similar to leucaena supplementation and young Guinea grass (Rusdy et al., 2019).

Fresh foliage in mixed dairy-goat rations

In West Sumatra, Indonesia, lactating Etawa crossbred dairy goats fed 50% gamal (Gliricidia sepium) forage with palm kernel cake concentrate (PKCC) and tofu waste had higher feed intake than goats fed field grass and tofu waste, while milk production was not significantly changed. Milk protein, fat, total solids and calcium were improved in the gamal treatment (Arief et al., 2023). Mixtures containing Mirasolia diversifolia, Gliricidia sepium or Indigofera zollingeriana with palm concentrate replaced company forage and concentrate. The mixtures containing 20% or 15% gliricidia maintained DM intake, OM intake, CP intake, digestibility, milk production and milk quality, but did not improve them significantly (Arief et al., 2023b). Replacing company forage with 50% cassava leaves plus gliricidia and replacing company concentrate partly with PKCC maintained Etawa crossbred dairy goat intake, digestibility, milk yield and milk composition. With 35% gliricidia, 15% cassava leaves and 35% PKCC, DM digestibility was 70.4%, compared with 68.4% in the control (Arief et al., 2023c).

Dried foliage, hay and leaf meal

In Jamaica, dried gliricidia leaf meal partly replaced concentrate nitrogen in energy-balanced kinggrass-based diets for lactating goats. OM intake was lower with gliricidia than with concentrate, and nitrogen digestibility was lower in legume diets, but milk yield and composition were maintained. Up to half of concentrate nitrogen can be replaced when energy is balanced with banana and molasses (Richards et al., 1994).

In Nigeria, air-dried mixtures of 50% moringa with 50% gliricidia were tested in West African Dwarf goats. Intake and digestibility were high and similar to moringa alone: DM digestibility was 76.3% and CP digestibility 83.9%. Nitrogen retention was lower than with moringa alone, but the gliricidia-moringa mixture remained a promising protein supplement (Asaolu et al., 2011). Gliricidia leaf meal used with low-quality Panicum maximum hay supported similar total DM intake to cassava leaf meal, but had lower DM and CP digestibility, nitrogen retention and ADG. Growth was 18.1 g/day with gliricidia, compared with 26.4-27.9 g/day with cassava or leucaena leaf meals. Gliricidia was useful, but ranked below the other leaf meals as a protein supplement (Yousuf et al., 2007). West African Dwarf bucks fed cassava peels with 25% gliricidia hay had the lowest feed intake and ADG among the tested cassava-peel diets. Equal supplementation with 12.5% gliricidia hay and 12.5% lablab hay performed better, giving 41.1 g/day and the best feed conversion. Mixed legume hay was preferable to gliricidia hay alone (Kikelomo, 2022).

In the Philippines, native goats fed cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica) plus gliricidia responded better to sun-dried gliricidia than to fresh or calcium hydroxide-treated gliricidia. Sun-dried material increased DM intake from 2.03 to 2.75% of body weight, DM digestibility from 55.8 to 72.6% and CP digestibility from 74.6 to 84.0%. Calcium hydroxide treatment did not improve fresh forage (Mondejar et al., 2020).

Ensiled products and complete silages

In Nigeria, cassava peels were ensiled for 3 months with 4% molasses and gliricidia at 2:1 or 1:1 ratios. Both gliricidia silages fermented satisfactorily and improved DM and CP digestibility compared with cassava-peel silage alone. DM digestibility was 73.8% in the 2:1 silage and 71.2% in the 1:1 silage, versus 61.8% in the control (Oduguwa et al., 2013).

In East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia, complete silage containing a Pennisetum grass, gliricidia leaves, pollard bran and palm sugar was fed with soluble carbohydrates and fish meal. The diet with 45% complete silage, 40% soluble carbohydrates and 15% fish meal increased feed intake, OM and CP digestibility and ADG compared with lower fish meal levels. The result concerns supplementation of gliricidia-containing silage rather than gliricidia alone (Tahuk et al., 2025).

Acceptability and antinutritional factors

In Nigeria, West African Dwarf goats offered fresh gliricidia, leucaena and Panicum maximum as cut stems with leaves and fruits clearly preferred leucaena. Weekly intake was 48 kg for leucaena, 27 kg for Panicum and 18 kg for gliricidia. The goats inspected feeds by smelling and biting before selecting, and often ate fruiting bodies and leaves before stems (Odeyinka, 2000). West African Dwarf goats offered fresh leucaena and gliricidia mixtures consumed more leucaena than gliricidia. The highest feed intake, digestibility and growth were obtained with 75% leucaena and 25% gliricidia, not with higher gliricidia proportions. Urine colour changes indicated mimosine-related effects from leucaena at high levels, but signs disappeared as the trial progressed (Odeyinka, 2001).

In Venezuela, a comparative fodder-tree evaluation with sheep found low levels of tannin fractions in gliricidia and no detectable hydrolysable tannins; total polyphenols were 2.22% and total tannins 0.46%. Gliricidia had high potential DM degradability (84.0%) and was highly browsed, suggesting low antinutritional limitation under supplementary use (Garcia et al., 2006).

In Nigerian cassava-peel silages, gliricidia mixtures had low condensed tannin concentrations (2.6-2.8 mg/kg DM). Hydrocyanic acid was lower than in untreated cassava peels, particularly in the 1:1 gliricidia silage, and all silages had a pH below 4.5. Ensiling can therefore combine cassava peels and gliricidia while reducing cyanogenic risk (Oduguwa et al., 2013).

Pigs 

In pigs, gliricidia evidence is scarce and supports cautious, product-specific use. Leaf products were more promising than seed meal. Foliage meal was accepted in Cuba when mixed with sugarcane molasses, although high inclusion slowed eating and increased drinking. Fermented gliricidia (gamal) leaf flour in Indonesia replaced up to 30% of the concentrate fraction without depressing starter-pig performance. Roasted seed meal lowered haemoglobin and haematocrit in weaned piglets and should not be recommended as a soybean meal substitute (Diaz et al., 2005; Nguru et al., 2022; Sikone et al., 2016).

Leaf meal and fermented leaf flour

In starter Landrace-cross pigs in Indonesia, fermented gliricidia leaf flour prepared with tape yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) replaced 10, 20 or 30% of commercial concentrate for 10 weeks. Ration intake, ADG and feed conversion ratio were not significantly affected. Values were 1.21-1.27 kg/head/day, 415-435 g/head/day and 2.45-2.48, respectively (Nguru et al., 2022).

In Cuban growing pigs, diets containing 0, 15 or 30% sun-dried gliricidia foliage meal with molasses type B were fully consumed, but 30% markedly disturbed intake. Eating time increased from 13.0 to 75.9 min and eating rate fell from 51.6 to 10.4 g dry matter/min. Trough and water visits increased, and afternoon feeding was less regular, reflecting the higher bulk and water-holding capacity of the diets. Storage and molasses made the initially odorous, bitter meal more acceptable (Diaz et al., 2005).

Seed meal

In Indonesian weaned piglets, roasted gliricidia seed meal replaced soybean meal at 2.5 or 5% of the diet. Haemoglobin decreased from 13.3 g/100 ml in controls to 10.5 and 9.6 g/100 ml, and haematocrit from 37.1 to 33.4 and 29.9%. The 5% level fell below the authors' normal ranges. Residual activity of antinutritional factors after 15 min roasting, including coumarin and other myelotoxic compounds, was considered likely (Sikone et al., 2016).

Poultry 

Gliricidia sepium products can be used in poultry mainly as gliricidia leaf meal (GLM). Gliricidia leaf protein concentrate and fermented leaf extract  have also been tested. Their practical value is as a local protein, mineral and pigment source and, in ducks, as a natural additive for meat sensory quality. The main limitation is not the protein concentration but the combination of fibre, tannins, saponins, coumarin, cyanide and other antinutritional compounds, which can reduce intake, nutrient use and growth at high levels. In broilers, the safer range for GLM is low to moderate: 2-5% is generally acceptable, while higher levels are less consistent and may impair feed conversion, carcass yield or organ response. For laying hens, moderate use is possible, but 15% should be avoided in balanced diets because it reduced feed intake and egg production. Fermented leaf extract in duck drinking water improved meat percentage, reduced subcutaneous fat and improved sensory scores, but did not change carcass cut distribution. In quails, 1-4% GLM did not improve carcass composition.

Broilers

Most broiler studies tested dried GLM, while one Nigerian trial tested gliricidia leaf protein concentrate (GLPC) as a fish meal replacement. In starter chicks, 25% replacement of fish meal protein by GLPC, equivalent to 1.81% of the diet, maintained final weight, ADG and feed efficiency close to the control, whereas 50-100% replacement, equivalent to 3.62-7.24% of the diet, depressed weight gain and feed efficiency. GLPC did not markedly change dressed or eviscerated percentages, thigh, drumstick, wing, chest or back weights, but belly fat and neck weight were affected by treatment. Higher GLPC reduced several amino acid concentrations in the diets, notably methionine, lysine, cystine and glycine, which may have contributed to poorer growth. The authors concluded that only 25% replacement of fish meal protein was safe (Agbede et al., 2003).

In Ghana, sun-dried GLM at 5, 10 and 15% lowered feed intake, body weight gain and feed conversion efficiency in a dose-dependent manner, and final weight fell from 2.59 kg in the control to 2.31, 1.88 and 1.61 kg. Abdominal fat decreased from 2.40 to 1.70% of live body weight as GLM rose from 0 to 15%, while the skin, shanks, feet and beaks became increasingly yellow; liver and gizzard weights increased and dressing percentage was lower at 15%. GLM caused no mortality or health-related problems up to 15%, despite the increase in liver and gizzard weights. The practical inclusion proposed was 5% (Kagya-Agyemang et al., 2007). Linear programming in Ghana used GLM as a potential ingredient with 24.38% crude protein and 10.5 MJ/kg metabolisable energy (ME); under the entered prices and constraints, the least-cost starter and finisher formulas excluded GLM and concentrate, saving 1.61 and 4.48% relative to existing practice. This indicates that the economic value of GLM depends on local prices, nutrient constraints and available alternatives rather than on low ingredient price alone (Kim et al., 2020).

In Nigeria, when GLM was used at 1.2-4.8% of broiler finisher diets to replace 10-40% of soybean meal, total and daily weight gain, feed gain ratio and feed efficiency were not significantly affected, though feed intake changed with treatment. Thigh, wing and breast muscle percentages were not significantly affected, although dressed carcass weight and liver weight varied with treatment. Replacing soybean meal with GLM lowered feed price per kg, but the cost per kg animal produced was not significantly changed (Ayoola et al., 2018). 5% GLM maintained final weight, total weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), slaughter weight, dressed weight and dressing percentage close to the control, whereas 10% GLM reduced weight gain, feed intake, slaughter weight, dressed weight and dressing percentage (Oloruntola, 2018).

In Indonesia, 2% GLM in a commercial ration improved final weight and body weight gain, and no mortality was recorded at 2 or 4%; 4 and 6% were less favourable for growth, with mortality recorded at 6%, while feed intake and feed conversion were not significantly affected (Inzaghi et al., 2024). Substituting 2-8% of commercial feed with GLM did not significantly alter body weight gain or feed intake, but FCR was poorer at 6% than in the control. The 4% treatment increased carcass percentage without a significant change in abdominal fat, so 4% was considered the best compromise (Mulyono et al., 2024).

In Tanzania, in meat-type Sasso chickens, replacing soybean meal (SBM) with GLM at 25-75% supported slaughter weight and carcass yield broadly comparable to the control, while 100% replacement reduced slaughter weight, carcass weight, dressing percentage and breast weight. Meat dry matter and crude protein were highest at 25% GLM, meat yellowness increased with GLM level, tenderness and water-holding capacity (WHC) were not significantly affected, and cooking loss increased only at 100% replacement (Mwiru et al., 2025).

Laying hens

In Nigeria, in diets where GLM partly replaced maize and soybean meal at 5, 10 and 15%, feed intake declined from 124.0 to 111.6 g/day and hen-day egg production from 86.9 to 65.8% as GLM increased from 0 to 15%, while egg weight was not clearly affected; feed efficiency worsened at 15%, but feed cost decreased as GLM inclusion increased. Digestibility coefficients followed the same direction. The numerical trend supports limiting GLM inclusion in balanced layer diets (Ige et al., 2006).

In a low-input laying system in Nicaragua with scavenger chickens, dried Gliricidia sepium leaves were mixed with sorghum at about 1:4 by weight before coarse grinding. Farmers reported higher daily egg production, shorter pauses between clutches, thicker eggshells and more yellow yolks, but some rejection of gliricidia mixtures occurred and the main practical constraints were grinding labour, hand-mill wear and poor storage of the ground moist feed (Kyvsgaard et al., 1996).

Ducks

In Indonesia, in Bali ducks, the product tested was fermented gliricidia (gamal) leaf extract administered through drinking water. At 2-6%, it did not affect slaughter weight, carcass weight, carcass percentage or bone percentage, but it increased meat percentage from 48.2% in the control to 50.6-51.0% and reduced subcutaneous fat including skin from 24.8% to 22.4-22.8% (Sedana et al., 2025). Another Bali duck trial using the same 2-6% range found no significant effect on the percentage of breast, back, wing, thigh or drumstick cuts, suggesting that fermented gamal leaf extract changed broad meat and fat partitioning more than the distribution of carcass cuts (Wiradana et al., 2025). Organoleptic traits of Bali duck meat improved as fermented gamal leaf extract increased to 6%, with higher panel scores for colour, aroma, flavour, texture and overall acceptance. At 6%, meat was described as slightly dark red, non-fishy, soft and savoury, and the authors attributed these effects to antioxidant phytochemicals and lactic acid bacteria from fermentation (Aryadinata et al., 2025).

Quails

In Indonesia, female quails fed 1-4% GLM replacing commercial feed for 60 days showed no significant changes in breast and thigh meat, bone and skin percentages, or in meat:bone and meat:skin ratios. The trial therefore provides no evidence that 1-4% GLM improves carcass composition, although 4% was suggested as a possible level for further work (Bagaskara et al., 2025).

Rabbits 

Gliricidia sepium can be used for rabbits mainly as fresh leaves with a balanced concentrate, but not as a complete replacement for balanced diets or as a high-level ingredient for breeding bucks. Fresh gliricidia leaves supported better growth than fresh leucaena leaves, whereas cassava peel diets containing gliricidia and leucaena remained inferior to a conventional diet. At 20% of dietary dry matter (DM), dried gliricidia leaf meal depressed semen quality (Onwudike, 1995; Adejumo, 2006; Herbert et al., 2005).

Growing rabbits

With ad libitum pellets, rabbits consumed less fresh gliricidia than fresh leucaena (5.9 vs 7.2 g DM/day), but gliricidia increased concentrate intake and daily gain. Daily gain reached 21.2 g/day with gliricidia, 18.4 g/day with the control and 13.5 g/day with leucaena in one trial, and 18.1, 16.5 and 14.3 g/day in another. No external toxicity was observed, but mild kidney and liver lesions were reported (Onwudike, 1995).

In diets containing cassava peels, dried gliricidia and dried leucaena, the 50:25:25 combination was the best non-conventional option, but daily gain remained lower than with the conventional control (12.3 vs 16.6 g/day). Equal proportions depressed intake, gain, digestibility and protein efficiency (Adejumo, 2006).

Carcass, meat quality and breeding use

Dried gliricidia leaf meal at 25% gave the best carcass and fresh roast results. Raw meat composition and cooking losses changed little, but gliricidia-fed rabbits had a lower expressible moisture index (EMI), indicating better water-holding capacity (WHC), and fresh roasts from the 25% diet had the best acceptability and tenderness scores (Awonorin et al., 1994). In mature bucks, 20% dried gliricidia leaf meal reduced semen volume, spermatozoa concentration, total spermatozoa and motility. Testis weight was unchanged, but seminiferous tubule diameter was lower and mild degenerative changes were observed; this level should not be recommended for breeding males (Herbert et al., 2005).

Fish 

Gliricidia sepium has been tested in fish feeds mainly as dried leaf meal, fermented leaf meal and leaf extract. The most favourable responses occurred when it supplemented or partly replaced commercial feeds in omnivorous species, particularly after fermentation; responses were weaker or negative with some untreated leaf meal or extract treatments. It should therefore be treated as a local supplement requiring processing, dose control and diet balancing rather than as a simple fish meal substitute. Potential constraints are high fibre and secondary compounds. Studies noted hydrogen cyanide (HCN), tannins, saponins, coumarins, nitrates and phenolic acids as possible antinutritional factors, and one African catfish study measured phytate, oxalate, tannin and saponin in gliricidia leaf meal.

Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus and Oreochromis sp.)

In Nigeria, dried gliricidia leaf meal was screened as a 10% supplement in Nile tilapia fingerling diets, alongside cassava and Stylosanthes leaf meals. Gliricidia improved mean weight gain and specific growth rate (SGR) compared with the no-leaf-meal control, but cassava leaf meal gave the best growth, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and protein efficiency. Survival with gliricidia was 93%, suggesting acceptability but not superiority among leaf meals (Nnaji et al., 2010). Nile tilapia fingerlings were fed diets in which fish meal was blended with moringa leaf meal, gliricidia leaf meal or soybean meal. The diet containing fish meal, soybean meal and gliricidia gave a low FCR of 1.12 and 100% survival, while fish meal plus gliricidia alone gave the lowest weight gain and carcass protein. Gliricidia performed better when combined with soybean than when used alone (Edem, 2022).

In Aceh, Indonesia, fermented gliricidia leaf flour combined with egg was applied to commercial feed at 10, 15 or 20% for Nirwana Nile tilapia fingerlings. The 10% treatment gave the best feed efficiency, SGR and water stability close to the control feed, whereas higher levels were less favourable. This result supports low-dose fermented leaf flour when a binder/protein coating is used (Islama et al., 2020). Fermented gliricidia leaf flour produced with Aspergillus niger was added at 10, 15 or 20% to low-protein commercial feed for Nirwana Nile tilapia fingerlings. All supplemented diets improved weight gain, length gain, daily growth rate and FCR compared with the control, but 10% was optimal; higher levels reduced growth, probably because dietary fibre increased. Survival remained 100% (Islama et al., 2021).

In Gorontalo, Indonesia, fermented gliricidia leaf flour was included at 2, 3, 4 or 5% in formulated feeds for red tilapia fry. Weight gain increased with inclusion, with the best weight gain and length gain at 5%, although the authors reported a significant effect on weight but not on length. Survival was 100% at 4 and 5%, and FCR was lowest at 4% (Amati et al., 2026).

In East Java, Indonesia, ethanolic gliricidia leaf extract was mixed into pellets at 5, 10 or 15% for stocky/giant Nile tilapia fingerlings. The extract did not improve growth or survival; the control diet gave the highest absolute weight gain and daily growth, while survival was not significantly affected. Leaf extract therefore gave no practical growth advantage under these conditions (Sirait, 2023).

Giant gourami (Osphronemus gouramy)

In Bangka Belitung, Indonesia, fermented gliricidia leaf flour was mixed with commercial feed at 25, 50 or 75% for juvenile giant gourami. The 75% fermented leaf mixture gave the best daily growth and final weight response and reduced the need for commercial feed. Survival was not affected, suggesting that fermentation made high leaf-meal inclusion acceptable in this herbivorous-omnivorous species (Apriani et al., 2019).

African catfish (Clarias gariepinus)

In Ogun State, Nigeria, 10% dried gliricidia leaf meal was used to partly replace fish meal in African catfish fingerling diets, with or without Roxazyme G2 or Maxigrain enzyme. Untreated gliricidia depressed growth, but enzyme-supplemented diets restored performance; Maxigrain gave the highest final body weight, weight gain and best FCR, with no mortality. Enzymes were therefore needed for reliable use of 10% leaf meal. That study also reported phytate, oxalate, tannin and saponin in the leaf meal, which helps explain the poorer response to unsupplemented gliricidia and the value of enzyme support (Olopade et al., 2015). In a related Nigerian trial, African catfish juveniles received diets containing 10% gliricidia leaf meal with graded Maxigrain enzyme supplementation for 12 weeks. Haematological and serum biochemical values remained within normal physiological ranges, and the best overall blood profile occurred with the intermediate enzyme level. The authors concluded that enzyme-supplemented gliricidia did not cause haematological disorders (Ogungbesan et al., 2020).

Milkfish (Chanos chanos)

In Kupang, Indonesia, fermented gliricidia leaf flour was added to commercial milkfish feed at 10, 25 or 40% for 60 days. Growth increased most at 40%, where absolute weight gain reached 11.63 g, while survival was not significantly affected and remained above 93%. The result supports fermented leaf flour as a supplementary ingredient for milkfish when water quality is maintained (Gonsaga et al., 2023).

Freshwater pomfret/tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum)

In Aceh, Indonesia, fermented gliricidia leaf flour was included at 10-50% in diets for freshwater pomfret/tambaqui fry. Growth, feed utilisation efficiency and FCR improved up to 40%, with poorer results at 50%; the 40% diet gave the best absolute length and weight gain, SGR and FCR. Survival was not significantly affected. The response suggests an upper practical limit below 50% (Sari et al., 2024).

Bileh/rasbora (Rasbora sp.)

In Aceh, Indonesia, gliricidia leaf extract was sprayed on artificial feed at 10, 20 or 30 ml/kg for bileh fish. Growth and FCR improved progressively with dose, and 30 ml/kg gave the best SGR, absolute length gain, FCR and survival. The extract did not significantly affect survival, but it was safe and improved feed use in this locally cultured species (Zulfadhli et al., 2021).

Nutritional tables
Tables of chemical composition and nutritional value 

Avg: average or predicted value; SD: standard deviation; Min: minimum value; Max: maximum value; Nb: number of values (samples) used

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 25.3 4.3 19.6 37.0 24
Crude protein % DM 22.3 3.9 15.4 28.8 234
Crude fibre % DM 19.7 2.7 14.4 28.4 27
NDF % DM 49.7 6.4 35.1 60.7 260
ADF % DM 34.8 7.0 22.8 48.2 197
Lignin % DM 13.0 4.5 5.7 22.2 186
Ether extract % DM 4.2 0.7 3.0 5.5 32
Ash % DM 10.0 1.8 6.7 13.7 270
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 19.7 2.3 17.5 21.8 4
 
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 11.9 2.3 6.2 17.1 125
Phosphorus g/kg DM 2.3 0.3 1.6 3.0 137
Potassium g/kg DM 27.1 8.1 12.6 43.0 115
Sodium g/kg DM 0.4 0.5 0.1 1.4 6
Magnesium g/kg DM 4.5 1.0 2.6 7.2 27
Manganese mg/kg DM 79 29 7 109 9
Zinc mg/kg DM 35 13 17 52 10
Copper mg/kg DM 12 6 4 22 10
Iron mg/kg DM 153 70 15 217 9
 
Secondary metabolites Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Tannins (eq. tannic acid) g/kg DM 11.0 17.3 0.0 52.8 12
Tannins, condensed (eq. catechin) g/kg DM 10.9 16.5 0.0 40.7 9
 
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 75.6 *
OM digestibility, ruminants (gas production) % 81 1
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 73.3 *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 14.5 *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 11.5 *
ME ruminants (gas production) MJ/kg DM 9.3 6.8 11.9 2
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 55.1 1.5 53.5 56.5 3
a (N) % 31.2 18.6 11.4 66.8 6
b (N) % 55.8 21.8 21.9 80.1 6
c (N) h-1 0.078 0.022 0.046 0.107 6
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=4%) % 68 *
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=6%) % 63 13 50 80 6 *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Abdulrazak et al., 1996; Abdulrazak et al., 1997; Abdulrazak et al., 2006; Agbede, 2006; Ahn et al., 1989; Ahn JongHo et al., 1997; Ajayi et al., 2005; Alayon et al., 1998; Apori et al., 1998; Ash, 1990; Aumont et al., 1991; Babayemi, 2007; Balogun et al., 1998; Barnes, 1998; Bosman et al., 1995; Camero Rey, 1993; CGIAR, 2009; CIRAD, 1991; Devendra et al., 1970; Evitayani et al., 2004; Falvey, 1982; FUSAGx/CRAW, 2009; Ibrahim et al., 1990; Ifut, 1992; Jayasuriya et al., 1982; Jones et al., 2000; Juma et al., 2006; Kabaija et al., 1988; Kaitho et al., 1997; Kaitho et al., 1998; Keir et al., 1997; Khamseekhiew et al., 2001; Larbi et al., 1998; Larbi et al., 2005; Mahyuddin et al., 1988; Merkel et al., 1999; Mlay et al., 2006; Mpairwe et al., 1998; Nguyen Van Hao et al., 2001; Ondiek et al., 1999; Premaratne et al., 1998; Reddy et al., 2008; Rever et al., 1967; Rubanza et al., 2003; Serra et al., 1996; Smith et al., 1987; Smith et al., 1988; Teguia et al., 1999; Vadiveloo et al., 1992; Viengsavanh Phimphachanhvongsod et al., 2002; Yousuf et al., 2007

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:21

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Crude protein % DM 6.8 0.6 5.6 8.1 54
Crude fibre % DM 19.7 18.5 21.0 2
NDF % DM 84.5 3.1 75.3 88.7 55
ADF % DM 73.8 5.7 44.7 78.4 52
Lignin % DM 18.3 1.1 15.9 20.5 52
Ether extract % DM 2.7 1.8 3.6 2
Ash % DM 5.0 0.7 3.8 6.7 55
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 18.2 *
 
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 1.6 0.3 1.0 2.2 44
Phosphorus g/kg DM 1.0 0.2 0.8 1.4 49
Potassium g/kg DM 19.3 3.1 13.1 24.5 44
Magnesium g/kg DM 1.4 1
Manganese mg/kg DM 40 1
Copper mg/kg DM 7 1
Iron mg/kg DM 61 1
 
Secondary metabolites Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Tannins (eq. tannic acid) g/kg DM 0.0 1
 
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 75.6 *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 73.4 *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 13.3 *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 11.0 *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

CGIAR, 2009; CIRAD, 1991

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:21

References
References 
Datasheet citation 

Heuzé V., Tran G., 2026. Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium). Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/552 Last updated on July 1, 2026, 16:58

English correction by Tim Smith (Animal Science consultant) and Hélène Thiollet (AFZ)