Feedipedia
Animal feed resources information system
Feedipedia
Feedipedia

Did you find the information you were looking for? Is it valuable to you? Feedipedia is encountering funding shortage. We need your help to keep providing reference-based feeding recommendations for your animals.
Would you consider donating? If yes, please click on the button Donate.

Any amount is the welcome. Even one cent is helpful to us!

Elephant grass (Cenchrus purpureus)

Datasheet

Description
Click on the "Nutritional aspects" tab for recommendations for ruminants, pigs, poultry, rabbits, horses, fish and crustaceans
Common names 

Elephant grass, Napier grass, napier, merker grass, Uganda grass, bana grass, barner grass [English]; herbe à éléphant, fausse canne à sucre, canne fourragère [French]; capim-elefante, capim-napiê [Portuguese]; pasto elefante, yerba elefante, zacate elefante, hierba elefante, gigante, pasto de Uganda [Spanish]; mfufu [Afrikaans]; erepani [Cook Island]; Olifantsgras [Dutch]; rumput gajah [Indonesian, Malaysian]; erba elefante, erba Napier, erba ugandese [Italian]; urubingo [Kinyarwanda]; mabingobingo [Kiswahili]; acfucsracsracsr [Kosraean]; senjele [Nyanja]; bokso [Palauan]; puk soh [Pohnpeian]; vao povi [Samoan]; buntot-pusa [Tagalog]; cỏ voi [Vietnamese]; الثيوم الأرجواني [Arabic]; 象草 [Chinese]; Слоно́вая трава́ [Russian]

Synonyms 

Pennisetum purpureum Schumach., Pennisetum benthamii Steud.

Taxonomic information 

The taxon Cenchrus purpureus (Schumach.) Morrone was proposed in 2010 as a replacement for Pennisetum purpureum Schumach. (Chemisquy et al., 2010).

Description 

Elephant grass (Cenchrus purpureus (Schumach.) Morrone; syn. Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.) is a robust, tufted perennial C4 grass native to tropical Africa. It is one of the most productive tropical forage grasses and is widely grown in smallholder and commercial systems, particularly for cut-and-carry feeding. It is also grazed, made into hay or silage, and used as a biomass crop. Its value as feed depends strongly on cultivar, plant fraction, regrowth age and growing conditions (Mannetje, 1992; FAO, 2015; Pereira et al., 2021).

Morphology

Elephant grass is a robust, rhizomatous, tufted perennial grass. It has a vigourous root system, developing from the nodes of its creeping stolons. The culms are coarse, perennial, and may be up to 4-7 m in height, branched above. Elephant grass forms dense thick clumps, up to 1 m across. The leaves are flat, linear, hairy at the base, up to 100-120 cm long and 1-5 cm wide, with a bluish-green colour. The leaf margin is finely toothed and the leaf blade has a prominent midrib. The inflorescence is a stiff terminal bristly spike, up to 15-20 cm in length, yellow-brown to purplish in colour. Spikelets are arranged around a hairy axis, and fall at maturity. Spikelets are 4-6 mm long and surrounded by 2 cm long plumose bristles. There is little or no seed formation. When seeds are present they are very small (3 million seeds/kg) (CABI, 2014Francis, 2004; Mannetje, 1992; Duke, 1983). Elephant grass is very similar in appearance to sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) but its leaves are narrower and its stems are taller (DAFF, 2014).

Utilisation

Elephant grass is a very important forage in the tropics due to its high productivity. The crop is used principally as fresh forage in cut-and-carry systems. Young, leafy material can also be grazed, whereas older stands become stemmy and less readily consumed. Early-cut material can be dried for hay, and surplus forage may be ensiled when moisture and fermentation are properly controlled. Other uses include mulch, hedgerows, erosion control, thatching and biomass for energy or industrial processing (Mannetje, 1992; FAO, 2015; Pereira et al., 2021). Elephant grass, as implied by its name, is an important source of forage for elephants in Africa (Tchamba et al., 1993; Francis, 2004).

Elephant grass is a multipurpose plant. The young leaves and shoots are edible by humans and can be cooked to make soups and stews (Burkill, 1985). The culms can be used to make fences, and the whole plant is used for thatch. It is considered a potential second generation energy source crop in the USA (EPA, 2013). Leaf and culm infusions are reported to have diuretic properties (Duke, 1983). Elephant grass has several environmental applications. It can be used to make mulch and to provide soil erosion control. It is a weed controller and, in Africa, it has been reported to be used as a trap plant in push-pull management strategies to fight against stemborers in maize crops (see Environmental impact below) (Khan et al., 2007).

Cultivars

Many cultivars of elephant grass have been developed worldwide to suit local conditions and there is a wide range of habits, yield potential and nutritive value. A morpho-agronomic classification developed for Brazilian germplasm distinguishes four main groups within C. purpureus:

  • Dwarf group: short plants with reduced internode length and a high leaf-to-stem ratio, generally suited to grazing or frequent cutting. Mott and BRS Kurumi belong to this group. Their dwarf habit results from a recessive gene that shortens the stem internodes; Merkeron de Pinda carries the gene in the heterozygous state but has normal stature (Corrêa, 2018; Pereira et al., 2017).
  • Cameroon group: tall, erect plants forming dense tussocks, with thick stems, broad leaves, predominantly basal tillers and late or absent flowering. Traditional representatives include Cameroon, Piracicaba, Vruckwona and Guaçu (Corrêa, 2018).
  • Mercker (or Merker) group: plants of comparatively lower stature, with thin stems and smaller, narrower and more numerous leaves. Flowering is generally early. They are resistant to Helminthosporium. Mercker, Mercker Comum and Mercker Pinda are placed in this group (Corrêa, 2018).
  • Napier group: tall plants with thick stems, broad leaves, relatively open tussocks and an intermediate flowering period. Napier, Mineiro and Taiwan A-146 are traditional examples (Corrêa, 2018).

Hybrids

Elephant grass has the capability to exchange alleles with other Pennisetum species, and several hybrids have been developed. Hybrids of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and elephant grass ("King grass", "Pusa Giant", "Bana grass", "Florida" and others) benefit from the desirable characteristics of pearl millet such as vigour, drought resistance, disease tolerance, forage quality and seed size, whereas elephant grass provides rusticity, aggressiveness, perennity, palatability and high DM yield (Timbo et al., 2010). Triploid hybrids are generally sterile and must be propagated vegetatively, while chromosome-doubled hexaploid materials may restore fertility and provide breeding material for seed-propagated cultivars (Pereira et al., 2021).

These hybrids are genetically distinct from cultivars belonging strictly to C. purpureus and will not be presented in this datasheet.

Distribution 

Elephant grass originated from sub-Saharan tropical Africa (Clayton et al., 2013). It has been introduced throughout tropical and subtropical regions,  into the USA in 1913, into Central and South America and the West Indies in the 1950s, and into Australia in the 1960s.  Elephant grass is now cultivated and naturalised in Africa, Asia, Oceania and the Americas.

Elephant grass is a summer growing grass that grows from sea level up to an altitude of 2000 m in favourable conditions (Francis, 2004). It does well in places where temperatures range from 25 °C to 40 °C (FAO, 2015) and where annual rainfall is over 1500 mm. It stops growing below 15 °C and is sensitive to frost, though it can regrow from the stolons if the soil is not frozen (Duke, 1983). It does better on rich, deep soils, such as friable loams, but can grow on poorly drained clays, with a fairly heavy texture, or excessively drained sandy soils with a pH ranging from 4.5 to 8.2 (FAO, 2015; Cook et al., 2005; Duke, 1983). 

Elephant grass is not tolerant of flooding and prefers well-drained soils. With poor drainage, it is best grown on raised beds (Göhl, 1982). Prolonged waterlogging is generally unsuitable (CABI, 2014; Cook et al., 2005; FAO, 2015). Drought tolerance varies markedly among cultivars and germplasm. Field studies with drought-tolerant cultivars showed interactions among cultivar, season and regrowth age, while evaluation of a wider germplasm set identified substantial variation in biomass production, water-use response and feed quality under contrasting soil moisture (Ledea-Rodríguez et al., 2018; Habte et al., 2022). It has been a pioneer species in arid lands such as the Galapagos Islands (CABI, 2014). The species performs best in full sunlight. Survival or production under partial shade has been reported for individual cultivars and sites (Cook et al., 2005; FAO, 2015; CABI, 2014).  It does not withstand complete shade under a dense tree canopy (Francis, 2004).

Elephant grass sometimes becomes invasive and is often regarded as a weed in crops, along roadsides, waterways, wetlands, floodplain, swamps, forest edges, disturbed areas and wastelands (CABI, 2014Francis, 2004).

Forage management 

Establishment

Elephant grass produces very few seeds, the plant is normally propagated vegetatively through stem cuttings consisting of at least 3 nodes, 2 of which are buried in rows. Row width ranges from 50 to 200 cm and distance within rows is between 50 and 100 cm (Mannetje, 1992). Planting material should be mature enough to provide reserves, contain viable protected buds and be placed in moist soil with one or more nodes covered. Row and within-row spacing should be selected for cultivar, machinery, erosion-control function and intended use rather than presented as a single standard. Tall and dwarf genotypes may differ in early growth pattern, but planting-material quality and meristem survival are more important than genotype alone for successful establishment (Ribeiro et al., 2022). After planting, elephant grass grows vigorously and can reach 4 m in 3 months (Skerman et al., 1990).

Yield, cultivar choice and fertilisation

Forage yield varies widely with genotype, rainfall or irrigation, temperature, soil fertility, cutting frequency and the method used to annualise measurements. Yields range from 20 to 80 t DM/ha/year under high fertilizer inputs (Francis, 2004; Skerman et al., 1990). With no, or inadequate, fertilizer, yields are in the range of 2-10 t DM/ha/year (Bogdan, 1977). In Brazilian cultivar evaluations, annual dry-matter production was approximately 30 t/ha for the dwarf cultivar BRS Kurumi and 50 t/ha for the tall cultivar BRS Capiaçu. For BRS Capiaçu harvested as green chop at 50–70 days of regrowth, individual cuts yielded 5.1–13.3 t DM/ha. In a separate irrigated semiarid experiment receiving nitrogen fertiliser, annualised dry-matter production reached 72 t/ha (Pereira et al., 2017; Pereira et al., 2021; Monção et al., 2019a).

Large differences also occur among genotypes within the same environment. In a lowland Ethiopian evaluation, ILRI 16803 produced 45.24 t DM/ha/year, compared with 31.14 t DM/ha/year for the standard check Zehone-02; cultivar differences were also reported in the West Usambara highlands (Bekuma et al., 2024b; Maleko et al., 2019). These figures describe particular experiments and should not be treated as expected farm yields without considering site, season, harvest age, water regime and fertilisation.

Elephant grass is highly responsive to nitrogen, water and other nutrients, but response depends on soil and climate. Fertiliser recommendations should be based on soil analysis, expected yield and local guidance. Excessive nitrogen or heavy organic-waste application can increase costs, nutrient losses and nitrate risk, particularly when drought is followed by rapid regrowth (Pereira et al., 2021; Gontijo et al., 2017).

The main management trade-off is between biomass yield and forage quality. Delayed harvest generally increases standing dry matter and stem proportion but reduces crude protein concentration, leaf proportion and digestibility. The rate of change varies with cultivar and season (Monção et al., 2019a; Monção et al., 2019b). Harvest targets should therefore be linked to intended use.

Association

Elephant grass is commonly grown in pure stands but may be associated with forage legumes or other crops. Legumes can improve diet protein supply, seasonal forage distribution and soil nitrogen, although the response depends on persistence, competition and harvest management. Intercropping and closer spacing have increased total herbage production in individual trials, but short plot studies should not be converted directly into general stocking-rate or fertiliser recommendations (Bekuma et al., 2024a). It has been associated with legumes such as puero (Pueraria phaseoloides), centro (Centrosema pubescens), perennial soybean (Neonotonia wightii) and leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) (Mannetje, 1992). Such associations have higher nutritional value than elephant grass alone and can produce higher DM yields, suppress weeds and improve soil fertility. In central Kenya, a comparison of three legumes (Desmodium intortumMacrotyloma axillareNeonotonia wightii) associated with elephant grass concluded that Desmodium intortum was the best choice whereas Neonotonia wightii gave the lowest performance (Mwangi et al., 2004). Elephant grass is sometimes intercropped with banana and cassava in home gardens (Mannetje, 1992).

Fresh cut-and-carry forage

Elephant grass is often fed fresh in cut-and-carry systems. It can be manually or mechanically chopped prior to feeding to reduce the selection of leaves and stems by the animal. Chopping and then wilting in the sun for several hours reduces moisture, stimulates appetite, facilitates rumination and thus improves forage utilisation (Moran, 2011). The ideal harvest regime depends on the cultivar, weather conditions, soil fertility, management practices and livestock needs. harvest while leaf proportion and intake potential remain high. A six- to eight-week interval remains a common practical reference under favourable tropical conditions, but it should be adjusted for cultivar, rainfall, temperature and animal requirements (Mannetje, 1992; Pereira et al., 2021). In Kenya, the recommendation is to harvest elephant grass for the first time when it attains a height of 1-1.2 m, usually 3-4 months after planting. Thereafter the grass should be harvested at intervals of 6 to 8 weeks, at the same height. Well-managed elephant grass can be harvested every month in hot and wet environments, or every 2 months in drier areas. Harvesting at longer intervals produces higher DM yields but lower quality forage as protein and ash content, digestibility and leaf-to-stem ratios decline. Leaving 10-15 cm high stubble provides sufficient carbohydrate reserves for subsequent regrowth (Orodho, 2006).

Pasture

When used for pasture, elephant grass should be heavily grazed so that most of the young leaves and shoots, which have the highest nutritive value, are available to ruminants. Grazing at 6-9-week intervals at a height of about 90 cm gives good utilization. Nitrogen can be applied after each grazing or cutting in high-rainfall areas. Any coarse, leafless stems should be mowed (FAO, 2015). Leafy cultivars are valuable to maintain a short grazing cycle that prevents accumulation of coarse stems. Dwarf materials such as BRS Kurumi have maintained high protein concentration and in vitro digestibility under rotational management, but biomass is lower than in tall cultivars (Morenz et al., 2017).

Hay and dry grass

When elephant grass is intended for hay it should be cut at an early stage of maturity as the stems become too coarse when the plant ages. In Taiwan, elephant grass is used for the production of dehydrated grass pellets used as a supplementary stock feed (Manidool, personal communication cited by FAO, 2015). BRS Canará was best harvested at about 60–76 days: older material increased yield but reduced quality and produced coarser hay (Ferreira et al., 2018).

Standover or deferred feed

In Queensland (Australia), elephant grass has been used for dry-season feed by rolling at the end of winter, as it can make some winter growth during this period (Quinlan et al., 1975).

Silage

Elephant grass can be made into useful silage. The harvest stage should balances adequate dry matter and fermentability with acceptable fibre concentration, then correct moisture or substrate limitations during silo preparation (Oliveira et al., 2017; Silva et al., 2025). Elephant grass may be ensiled alone but young forage is often too wet and may contain insufficient readily fermentable carbohydrate for a rapid and stable fermentation. More mature forage contains more dry matter but is more fibrous and less digestible.  In practice, the high moisture of elephant grass when its nutritive value is highest is an obstacle for using it as silage, because it results in undesirable fermentation with considerable nutrient losses (Manyawu et al., 2003a). Silage management must therefore begin with harvest stage and initial DM concentration rather than with additive choice (Oliveira et al., 2017; Silveira et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2025). In Zimbabwe, it was concluded that elephant grass should be harvested for ensiling between 6 and 7 weeks, at the peak of water-soluble carbohydrate concentration, to increase DM content and optimize herbage production without affecting nutritive value (Manyawu et al., 2003a).

Practical sequence
  • Harvest suitable material: balance moisture, soluble substrate, fibre concentration and expected feeding value (Silveira et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2025).
  • Chop uniformly: facilitate packing and reduce air entrapment without reducing particle size excessively (Cai et al., 2020).
  • Correct excess moisture where necessary: use short wilting or a suitable dry absorbent; avoid prolonged field exposure that causes losses or contamination (Oliveira et al., 2017; Silva et al., 2025).
  • Supply fermentable substrate when needed: molasses, starch-rich meals or compatible crop mixtures can improve acidification, but dose and feeding consequences must be checked (Oliveira et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2022; Wodebo et al., 2023).
  • Use inoculants or enzymes for a defined objective: adapted lactic-acid bacteria may improve fermentation or aerobic stability, whereas fibrolytic enzymes primarily target fibre degradation. Effects are strain-, dose-, crop- and temperature-specific (Amaral et al., 2020; Dong et al., 2025).
  • Seal immediately and exclude air: a 24-hour sealing delay caused poor fermentation and faster aerobic spoilage in a laboratory study, and additives did not compensate fully for the delay (Cai et al., 2020).
  • Manage the feed-out face: limit oxygen entry and monitor heating, mould and refusal after opening (Amaral et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2020).

For these reasons, elephant grass is often ensiled with materials that improve the quality of the silage and its nutritional value (protein or energy). The following table provides examples of ensiling treatments and their results.

Table 1. Examples of ensiling treatments

Country Treatment Results Reference
Japan Molasses (4-5%) Improved silage quality by increasing lactic acid content and reducing pH value, ammonia nitrogen and acetic, propionic and butyric acid contents. Molasses addition did not modify nutrient digestibility (goats) but inhibited proteolysis during the ensiling process and improved nitrogen retention. Molasses increased WSC in the silage, increasing its value as an energy source. Yokota et al., 1992; Yokota et al., 1991; Yunus et al., 2000
Japan Molasses (4%) and defatted rice bran (15%) Improved fermentation quality and thus enhanced silage utilization. Yokota et al., 1998
Thailand Molasses or cassava roots (5%) Higher digestibilities with molasses than with cassava (cows). Bureenok et al., 2012
Brazil Sugarcane (25%) Sugarcane provided readily fermentable sugars while coarse mature elephant grass acted as an absorbent and provided high DM content. Cavali et al., 2010
Brazil Sugarcane (30 to 45%) and cocoa meal (15%) Increased the degradability of mature forage. Teixeira et al., 2008
Brazil Cassava pomace (5%) Increased non-fibrous carbohydrates, good preservation and good digestibility (dairy heifers). Andrade et al., 2010; Silva et al., 2007
Nigeria Cassava peels (up to 50%) Improved the physical attributes of the silage and its nutritive value (goats). Olorunnisomo, 2011
Zimbabwe Pre-wilting with maize meal (5%) Increased intake and palatability (sheep). Manyawu et al., 2003b
Ethiopia Dehydrated cashew stalks (16% fresh basis) Increased nitrogen content. Teles et al., 2010
Brazil Cashew or dehydrated pineapple by-products (10.5%) Increased body weight gain (sheep) when compared with elephant grass silage alone. Ferreira et al., 2009b
Brazil Pineapple by-products (14%) Increased digestible nutrient intake (sheep). Ferreira et al., 2009a
Japan Phasey bean (Macroptilium lathyroides) (25%) Improved the nutritive value of silage. Yunus et al., 2001
Brazil Cocoa meal (10-30%) Increased nitrogenous fractions, but also the non-digestible fraction of carbohydrates and acid detergent insoluble nitrogen, which limits the use of cocoa meal as a silage ingredient. Andrade et al., 2010
Brazil Passion fruit by-product, dehydrated (14%) Increased the energy value, intake and digestibility of the silage (sheep). Neiva et al., 2006
Brazil Acerola (Malpighia emarginata) by-product, dehydrated (14%) No effect on DM intake and nutrient digestibility, but positive nitrogen balance (sheep). Ferreira et al., 2010
Brazil Cameroon grass harvested after 8 or 16 weeks of regrowth, at 08:00 or 14:00 Afternoon harvesting generally increased soluble carbohydrate concentration and improved selected fermentation characteristics. Younger forage had greater in vitro digestibility, but the results varied between sites. Silveira et al., 2021
Brazil Sun-wilting for 8 h or cassava meal at 7.5-22.5% of fresh matter Both treatments increased silage DM content and reduced effluent. High cassava-meal levels could increase gas losses and dilute the protein content. Oliveira et al., 2017
Brazil BRS Capiaçu grass ensiled directly, with ground cornmeal (8% fresh matter), or after wilting for 3 or 5 days Cornmeal addition or three-day wilting improved selected fermentation characteristics. Five-day wilting provided no clear additional benefit, and only cornmeal improved degradability. Silva et al., 2025
China Sorbic acid (0.1%), ethanol (1.5%) or molasses (1%), alone or in combination; previously fermented juice (5 mL/kg) Sorbic acid or ethanol combined with molasses produced the most favourable fermentation. Previously fermented juice alone was not consistently beneficial. Zhang et al., 2022
China Citric-acid residue (36 g/kg fresh matter) and lactic-acid bacteria, alone or combined The treatments improved fermentation and reduced ammonia nitrogen, but did not improve aerobic stability after opening. Tao et al., 2021
China Lactobacillus plantarum and fibrolytic enzymes (0.1% fresh matter), alone or combined The inoculant mainly improved acidification and reduced ammonia nitrogen, whereas the enzymes improved fibre degradation and in vitro digestibility. The combination produced the best overall fermentation. Dong et al., 2025
Brazil Fourteen lactic-acid bacterial strains applied to BRS Capiaçu grass Effects were strain-specific. Selected heterofermentative strains, particularly Lactobacillus farraginis CCMA 1364, reduced DM losses and improved aerobic stability. Amaral et al., 2020
Mozambique Sealing within 10 h of harvest or after about 24 h, with or without lactic-acid bacteria and cellulase A 24-hour sealing delay impaired fermentation and accelerated aerobic spoilage. The additives did not compensate for delayed sealing. Cai et al., 2020
Ethiopia Napier grass ensiled alone or in 50:50 mixtures with oat; molasses added at 3% of fresh matter The 50:50 mixture containing oat ILRI 5527A produced the most favourable fermentation and lowest losses. The response depended on the oat genotype. Wodebo et al., 2023
Environmental impact 

Weed and soil erosion control

Elephant grass is a pioneer species that competes very efficiently with weeds (FAO, 2015D'Antonio et al., 1992). In the Philippines, it has been used to control Imperata cylindrica (Skerman et al., 1990Duke, 1983). In Nigeria, elephant grass has been used as mulch (25 cm layer) for weed control, for water storage and to reduce soil losses on slopes (Adekalu et al., 2007; Francis, 2004). Elephant grass develops a vigourous root system that may help to prevent river bank erosion. Planted as hedgerows, elephant grass makes fences and provides effective windbreaks for crops and houses. It is used for erosion control and forage production in alley-cropping systems of agroforestry (Magcale-Macandog et al., 1998).

Biological control agent of pests

Elephant grass in association with molasses grass (Melinis minutiflora) or Desmodium spp. may be a valuable biological agent to control the maize stemborer moth. The moth, pushed out of the field by molasses grass or Desmodium, lay eggs on elephant grass. When the larvae start boring elephant grass, the plant releases a sticky liquid that kills almost all larvae while the surviving ones are attacked by Cotesia sesamiae. Performance differs among elephant-grass cultivars, so the choice of trap plant is important (Khan et al., 2007Parrott, 2005).

Drought adaptation and climate scenarios

Substantial genetic variation exists for performance under water limitation. In a multi-year evaluation of 84 genotypes, several entries combined drought tolerance with useful biomass and feed-quality traits, indicating scope for targeted selection (Habte et al., 2022). 

Invasiveness

The same persistence and competitive growth that make elephant grass useful can create an invasive risk where it escapes cultivation. Elephant grass is considered a noxious weed in many places in the world (CABI, 2014). Its ability to out-compete other plants makes it very aggressive, particularly to communities of native plants. This has been reported in the Galapagos Islands (Mauchamp, 1997) and in Florida (Francis, 2004). Planting for forage, erosion control or biomass should therefore follow local weed regulations and include containment, monitoring and rapid removal of escaped stands.

Methane production

Methane production by ruminants is linked to structural carbohydrates contained in forage-based diets, and, due to its high cell wall content, elephant grass could result in a high methane production. In vitro studies showed that replacing 20–25% of an elephant-grass basal substrate with selected tannin- or saponin-containing tree and shrub foliage (Acacia mangiumBiophytum petersianumJatropha curcasPsidium guajavaSapindus saponaria, Morus alba or Trichanthera gigantea) significantly reduced in vitro methane production in comparison to elephant grass fed alone (Delgado et al., 2012Hariadi et al., 2010). 

However, enteric methane depends on the complete diet, intake, digestibility, animal productivity and the denominator used to express emissions. In Brazil, an in vivo comparison of methane production between steers grazing dwarf elephant grass only or a pasture of dwarf elephant grass with peanut (Arachis pintoi) found that daily CH4 emissions were higher for the mixed pasture when expressed as g CH4/day but similar when expressed in g/kg of DM intake or average daily gain. Since the mixed pasture led to higher gain, steers grazing it can improve their performance with lower grazing time without increasing methane production by kg of DM intake (Andrade et al., 2016).

Bioenergy and biorefinery uses

In the USA, the Environment Protection Agency agreed that elephant grass could be used as a source of biofuel under the Renewable Fuel Standard Program provided producers respect the Risk Management Plan for early detection and rapid response to potential spread (EPA, 2013). In Mexico, it was possible to obtain a biomass yield of 38.5 t DM/ha/yr with a production of 675 GJ energy/ha and a theoretical bioethanol yield of 7,936 L/ha/yr at a cutting frequency interval of 180 days. Nevertheless, life-cycle assessments remain necessary before such utilizations can be said to provide environmental benefits (Ventura-Ríos et al., 2022).

Nutritional aspects
Nutritional attributes 

Elephant grass has a moderate to rather low average crude-protein content, about 10% of DM, but young leafy forage can be highly nutritious. In Venezuela, crude protein declined from 21% DM at 30 days of regrowth to less than 4% DM at 70 days (Butterworth, 1965). Depending on maturity, NDF concentration commonly ranges from 55 to 75% DM (Moran, 2011). Fresh elephant grass is rich in moisture: it can contain as little as 12% DM, with reported values of about 16% in leaves and 9% in stems. This high moisture concentration can limit intake and complicate ensiling when the forage is young (Moran, 2011).

Composition is highly variable. Genotype, environment, altitude, season, fertilisation, plant fraction and harvest management can alter crude protein, fibre, minerals, digestibility and fatty-acid composition. Young, leafy material generally contains more protein and is more degradable, while advanced maturity increases stem and structural carbohydrate; leaves are more degradable than stems (Kebede et al., 2016; Rahman et al., 2019; Ledea-Rodríguez et al., 2018; Rambau et al., 2016). In a Brazilian study of dwarf elephant-grass hay harvested after 30, 50, 70 or 90 days of regrowth, DM, organic matter, NDF and lignin concentrations did not differ significantly with age, whereas ADF and non-structural carbohydrates increased linearly. Non-protein nitrogen accounted for almost all soluble nitrogen, which increased four-fold from 30 to 70 days and then decreased at 90 days (Kozloski et al., 2005). 

In Indonesia and Central Africa, nutritive value was lower in the dry season, with less protein and more lignin, than in the rainy season. In Kenya, hay and silage preserved surplus wet-season elephant grass with similar efficiency, indicating that either method may provide forage for the dry season when properly implemented (Evitayani et al., 2004a; Tedonkeng Pamo et al., 2007; Brown et al., 1985). An older Queensland study described mature stand-over elephant grass as remaining green and succulent through winter and spring. This local observation should not be read as evidence of general frost tolerance, since the species is frost-sensitive (Milford, 1960; Duke, 1983). Surveys in Indonesia, the Philippines and Cameroon found phosphorus, magnesium, sulphur, copper, zinc or selenium concentrations below critical levels for grazing livestock, whereas calcium was generally adequate. Mineral supplementation should therefore be based on forage analysis and local animal requirements rather than assumed from species averages (Nasrullah et al., 2004; Njwe et al., 1988; Orden et al., 1999).

Potential constraints 

Nitrate poisoning

Elephant grass can cause nitrate poisoning when high-nitrate forage forms a large proportion of the diet (Cook et al., 2005). Fatal nitrate poisoning of cattle fed solely on elephant grass was reported in Malaysia in 1979. Nitrate levels in elephant grass from the toxic area averaged 28.3 mg/g (up to 44 mg in some samples) while level from non-toxic areas was 3.9 mg/g (Seiler et al., 1979). In 2001-2002, in the semi-arid region of Paraíba, in Northeast Brazil, two outbreaks of nitrate poisoning due to elephant grass occurred at the end of the dry season, after the first rains and application of cattle manure as fertilizer. Clinical signs were anorexia, respiratory distress, teeth grinding, depression or hyperexcitability, tremors, abdominal contractions, salivation, nasal discharge, uncoordinated gait, cyanosis, and finally recumbency (Medeiros et al., 2003). In 2017, in Minas Gerais, in Southwest Brazil, three heifers died after the abrupt diet change of maize silage for elephant grass, showing brownish colored mucosa of conjunctiva and vaginal vestibule, gray-bluish tongue, dyspnea, sialorrhea, tympany, and progression to sternal decubitus and death after 1 to 3 weeks (Gontijo et al., 2017).

Oxalate content

Total oxalate concentrations of 2.5–3.1% DM were historically reported without observed animal health problems (Cook et al., 2005). In Malaysia, in a recent comparison of seven cultivars, total oxalate ranged from 1.95 to 3.23% DM and was higher in leaves than in stems; dwarf elephant grass had the highest soluble and total oxalate concentrations (Rahman et al., 2020a).

Mature leaves and physical quality

Mature elephant-grass leaves have finely toothed, sharp margins that can injure grazing cattle, while older plants develop coarse stems and become less palatable (FAO, 2015).

Ruminants 

Elephant grass is one of the most important fodder grasses for ruminants in the tropics, largely due to its high productivity. It can provide productive pasture, fresh cut-and-carry forage, hay or silage for cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats. It is grazed, used for cut-and-carry, dried or ensiled (Moran, 2011). The high variability among cultivars may result in many differences regarding intake and animal performance (Islam et al., 2003). There is a trade-off between nutritive value, which decreases with the maturity of the plant, and the forage production, which depends on rainfall (Machado et al., 2008). Its feeding value declines with maturity, and young forage may also be limited by high moisture. Supplementation is commonly required for high milk yield or rapid growth. Cultivar, harvest age, forage form and the balance of the complete diet must therefore be considered together.

Palatability

Elephant grass is extremely palatable when young and leafy (Cook et al., 2005). However, it becomes coarse and less palatable when it matures (Cook et al., 2005; Moran, 2011). In a trial in Nigeria, fresh elephant grass cut during the dry season was less palatable to West African dairy goats than Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus), Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala or Terminalia catappa (Babayemi, 2007). Goats were also found to refuse elephant grass in a free-grazing trial (Babayemi, 2007). Animals tend to select the most palatable and nutritive parts so that differences in quality are less important in the actual intake than in the offered feed, as was shown in a trial in Venezuela with sheep fed ad libitum elephant grass cut at different stages (Butterworth, 1965). For that reason, fresh elephant grass is often chopped to prevent animals from selecting the best parts (Moran, 2011).

Digestibility and intake

Elephant grass is rather low in energy and protein, due to its high cell wall content (Artus-Poliakoff et al., 1991; Krishnamoorthy et al., 1995). Elephant grass is sensitive to climatic conditions, maturity and regrowth age: crude protein declines and fibre increases, while in situ DM and cell wall degradability and in vivo digestibility decrease (Butterworth, 1965; Kaitho et al., 1998; Sarwar et al., 1999a; Sarwar et al., 1999b). Young elephant grass generally has a higher nutritive value than mature material (Butterworth, 1965; Kaitho et al., 1998; Sarwar et al., 1999a; Sarwar et al., 1999b). However, because its cell wall content does not increase with age as fast as in other tropical forages, such as kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) and pangola grass (Digitaria eriantha), elephant grass retains a given level of digestibility for a longer period (Orodho, 2006). In Venezuela, OM digestibility measured on sheep ranged from 65% at 30 days of regrowth to 60% at 70 days (Butterworth, 1965). In Brazil, DM intake and OM digestibility measured in steers linearly decreased with days of regrowth: OM digestibility varied from 75% at 33 days to 56% at 93 days. The authors recommended using of elephant grass between 30 and 35 days of regrowth (Machado et al., 2008).

A comparison of grass species in Brazil found that elephant grass has an in vitro DM digestibility similar to signal grass (Brachiaria decumbens), but higher than Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus) with a lower insoluble potentially degradable fraction and a higher degradation rate for DM, crude protein and cell wall (Benedetti et al., 2008). Elephant grass harvested in Central Brazil during the dry season after 100 days of growth had a better nutritive value (gas production) than Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), giant star grass (Cynodon plectostachyus) and koronivia grass (Brachiaria humidicola) due to its lower cell wall and lignin contents, and higher N content (Nogueira Filho et al., 2000).

When elephant grass is very young, its high water content might decrease voluntary intake due to a fill effect caused by water intake (Soares et al., 2009). Some results suggest that, at restricted level of intake, maturity can result in an increase of metabolizable energy available in the gastrointestinal tract (Kozloski et al., 2003). The duration of rumination and the transit time of feeds increased markedly with older grass, resulting in an increased digestive efficiency (Butterworth, 1965). In Pakistan, the use of N fertilizer increased the protein concentration of the elephant grass but could not reverse the adverse effects of maturity on nutrient digestibility in buffaloes (Sarwar et al., 1999a; Sarwar et al., 1999b).

Chopping is a common method for improving the overall value of the crop (Moran, 2011; see Forage management). Further processing with a roller mill may increase forage intake due to the higher rate of rumen digestion of the fibrous material through a greater cell wall surface area available for digestion by rumen microbes. Increasing forage intakes will reduce total feed costs, and improve feed efficiency and hence farm profits (Moran, 2011).

Fresh forage

Dairy cattle

Elephant grass is a popular forage in smallholder dairy farms in the tropics (Moran, 2011). It is often used for cut-and-carry as it can be easily harvested by hand for feeding to the stalled animals (Moran, 2011). In Kenya, it was suggested that elephant grass should be fed to dairy cows when it reaches a height of 55-60 cm (7-8 weeks) and 130-140 cm (9-10 weeks) in the medium and high rainfall areas (Muia et al., 1999). However, its low DM and high fibre content, as well as the physical nature of the crop, reduces the utilisation of freshly harvested elephant grass (Moran, 2011). As a sole feed or when supplemented only with leucaena, elephant grass will only support milk yields of 7 to 8 litres/cow/day (Muia et al., 2000b). Grass height (1 m vs. 1.5 m, i.e 4 to 6 weeks vs. more than 6 weeks) significantly affected daily DM intake (9.3 and 6.8 kg), total daily DM intake (10.5 and 7.9 kg), daily live-weight losses (165 and 490 g) and daily milk yield (8.6 and 6.9 kg/d, respectively) by cows fed ad libitum for 14 weeks from week 3 of lactation (Muinga et al., 1992).

A basal diet of elephant grass generally requires supplementation with a legume forage, an energy source or suitable by-products to achieve adequate dairy performance (Muinga et al., 1992; Muinga et al., 1995; Muia et al., 2000a; Muia et al., 2001; Shem et al., 2003). In a small grazing experiment, unsupplemented cows grazing Pioneiro elephant grass produced milk with a favourable fatty-acid profile. The 120-cm pre-grazing height with 50% removal proposed by the authors is study-specific because intake and milk-yield responses were not established (Dias et al., 2019).

Table 2. Effect of supplementation on performance of dairy cattle fed a basal diet of elephant grass

Country Animals Diet Results Reference
Brazil Holstein and crossbred (Holstein × Jersey) mid-lactation cows,
20 kg/d
Elephant grass pasture + concentrate (8.7% protein) Met protein requirements, highest efficiency of nitrogen utilisation. Danes et al., 2013
Brazil Lactating Holstein × Zebu cows Elephant grass pasture + chopped sugarcane with 1% urea Minimized the effects of the low pasture intake during the dry season. Lopes et al., 2004
Kenya Mid-lactation Jersey cows Elephant grass pasture + 3 kg maize bran + 8 kg fresh Clitoria ternatea or Mucuna pruriens or Gliricidia sepium Similar dairy performance for all legumes. Juma et al., 2006.
Kenya Ayrshire/Brown Swiss × Sahiwal cows Elephant grass ad libitum + 0, 4 or 8 kg fresh Leucaena leucocephala Increased daily DM intake, reduced daily liveweight loss and increased daily milk yield (7.3, 7.7 and 8.3 kg, respectively). Muinga et al., 1992
Kenya Ayrshire/Brown Swiss × Sahiwal cows Elephant grass ad libitum + 1 or 2 kg leucaena or 2 kg leucaeana + 1 kg maize bran Supplementation with maize bran and leucaena increased DM intake and allowed a higher milk yield than elephant grass alone or supplemented with leucaena. Maize bran increased energy utilization. Muinga et al., 1995
Kenya Dutch Friesian cows Mature elephant grass ad libitum + 3.65 kg DM sunflower meal or sun-dried poultry litter Increased milk production but cows fed 2 months or 15 weeks elephant grass lost weight. Supplementation with sun-dried poultry litter is suitable for low to medium producing cows whereas supplementation with sunflower meal is to be preferred for high production. Muia et al., 2000a; Muia et al., 2001
Tanzania Crossbred dairy cows (Bos taurus x Bos indicus) 400 kg,
9 kg/d milk
Elephant grass ad libitum + Gliricidia sepium + cottonseed meal 1.6 kg/d of cottonseed meal gave the highest milk yield but the best economic return was obtained with 0.5 kg/d DM cottonseed meal and 1.3 kg/d DM Gliricidia. Shem et al., 2003.
Brazil Lactating cows in a small grazing study Pioneiro elephant grass pasture; 120-cm pre-grazing height and 50% removal Milk had a favourable fatty-acid profile; intake and milk-yield responses were not measured. Dias et al., 2019
Ethiopia 8 lactating Fogera cows TMR with 70% elephant grass-grass hay and 30% concentrate vs. natural-pasture hay at the same ratio elephant grass hay increased DMI from 6.21 to 8.10 kg/day and increased milk yield by 52.9%. Mekuriaw et al., 2020
El Salvador 18 lactating Holstein cows Diet DM: 30% elephant grass silage + 10% maize silage vs. 40% maize silage; 8% fresh elephant grass common to both diets elephant grass substitution increased DMI and microbial protein synthesis while maintaining milk yield and composition. Corea-Guillen et al., 2025

Growing cattle

Elephant grass forage is able to support high animal production in tropical environments. In Hawaii, live-weight gains as high as 549 kg/ha were obtained with beef cattle grazing mature elephant grass (FAO, 2015). Live-weight gains of 1 kg/hd/day during the growing season and 480 kg/ha/yr are achievable (Cook et al., 2005). Supplementation improved performance particularly when growing cattle received mature elephant grass (Kaitho et al., 1998; Kariuki et al., 1999b; Neumann et al., 2005). In Kenya, elephant grass, Rhodes grass and brachiaria grass supported similar live-weight gain in steers and methane yield per unit intake, while the greater forage yield of elephant grass increased animal output per unit land (Korir et al., 2023). In Brazil, limited daily access to forage peanut increased intake and live-weight gain of steers grazing dwarf elephant grass without significantly increasing methane yield per unit intake .(Andrade et al., 2016).

Table 3. Effect of supplementation on growth performance of growing cattle fed a basal diet of elephant grass:

Country Animals Diet Results Reference
Kenya Growing Friesian heifers Fresh elephant grass (0.5 m, 6 weeks growth) ad libitum Average daily gain 0.5 kg/d, similar to that obtained with fresh sweet potato vines, but lower than with alfalfa hay (0.68 kg/d). Kariuki et al., 1998
Kenya Growing Friesian and Sahiwal heifers Fresh elephant grass (0.5 m, 6 weeks growth) ad libitum alone or with fresh Desmodium intortum (intercropped) or with Desmodium hay or alfalfa hay Average daily gains were 0.41, 0.45, 0.52 and 0.42 kg/d respectively but the diet with intercropped Desmodium gave the best economic returns. Kariuki et al., 1999a; Snijders et al., 2011
Kenya Growing Friesian and Sahiwal heifers Fresh elephant grass (6 or 12 weeks growth) ad libitum alone or with alfalfa hay (1.5-3.5 kg) Supplementation increased DM intake and average daily gain, from 0.32 kg/d to 0.65 kg/d in the case of 12-week grass. Kariuki et al., 1999b
Kenya Growing Friesian heifers Fresh young elephant grass (7 weeks growth) ad libitum alone or old elephant grass (16 weeks) + 25% fresh Desmodium intortum (intercropped), Calliandra calothyrsus or Sesbania sesban Average daily gain of 1.0 kg/d with young elephant grass. Old elephant grass supplemented with Desmodium, Calliandra and Sesbania allowed adequate daily gains of 0.64, 0.73 and 0.61 kg/d respectively. Kaitho et al., 1998
Kenya Growing Friesian steers Fresh elephant grass (8 weeks growth) ad libitum alone or + 10-30% (DM) of fresh Desmodium intortum or sweet potato vines Supplementation increased OM and protein intake, DM degradation and rumen fermentable OM. Kariuki et al., 2001
Brazil Charolais, Nellore and crossbreed steers and heifer calves Elephant grass pasture + concentrate at 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 and 1.25% of body weight Liveweight gain increased with the level of supplementation from 0.56 to 0.85 kg/d. Neumann et al., 2005
Brazil 12 Charolais steers BRS Kurumi pasture alone or with 5 h/day access to forage peanut Forage-peanut access increased DMI from 6.7 to 7.8 kg/day and ADG from 0.70 to 0.97 kg/day; methane yield per unit DMI was unchanged. Andrade et al., 2016
Thailand 8 Thai native beef bulls Dwarf elephant grass hay vs. silage offered ad libitum with the same concentrate allowance Hay increased DMI and apparent DM digestibility; no growth endpoint was measured. Mapato et al., 2018
Mexico 5 rumen-cannulated crossbred heifers Low-quality elephant grass progressively replaced by 0-80% Leucaena foliage in diet DM Methane production declined as Leucaena increased, but high replacement also reduced digestibility. Piñeiro-Vázquez et al., 2018
Kenya 18 yearling Boran steers Sole-grass diets of elephant grass cv. Kakamega 1, Rhodes grass or a Brachiaria hybrid DMI, ADG and methane yield were similar; greater elephant grass biomass increased animal output per unit land. Korir et al., 2023
South Africa 24 Sussex steers Feedlot TMR containing 0, 300 or 600 g/kg elephant grass replacing weeping lovegrass The 300 g/kg diet maintained performance; 600 g/kg reduced intake, growth and carcass weight. Rabatseta et al., 2024

Sheep and goats

Sheep and goats raised for meat or milk can be fed fresh elephant grass, usually in zero-grazing systems (Brown et al., 1988; Chandra et al., 2012). Supplementation with protein-rich foliage or energy sources improved growth, nitrogen use or dairy adequacy in several trials (Van Eys et al., 1987; Johnson et al., 1989; Mpairwe et al., 2002; Kahindi et al., 2007). The following table summarises trials carried out with or without supplementation. In forage-only cut-and-carry diets, the dwarf cultivars Mott and Taiwan A-146 2.37 supported greater intake and live-weight gain than the tall cultivars Elephant B and IRI-381. Another genotype comparison showed that the most digestible material did not provide the greatest digestible DM intake because voluntary intake was low (Silva et al., 2021a; Souza et al., 2017). Fresh CT-115 at 30% of diet DM increased intake but reduced apparent digestibility without significantly affecting growth, slaughter weight or carcass yield in lambs (Escalante et al., 2026).

Table 4. Performance of small ruminants fed a basal diet of elephant grass with or without supplementation:

Country Animals Diet Results Reference
Indonesia Javanese Thin-tail lambs and crossbred kids Elephant grass ad libitum + up to 50% (DM) cassava-urea Maximal average daily gain, feed efficiency and carcass weight at 30% cassava for sheep and 40% for goats. Van Eys et al., 1987
Indonesia Javanese Thin-tail lambs and Kacang kids Elephant grass + tree legume foliage or wilted cassava leaves Increased average daily gain up to 50 g/d for lambs and 20 g/d for kids. Faster gains were obtained with higher intakes of tree legume foliage, or with combinations of higher-energy supplements such as rice bran, cassava meal and molasses. Johnson et al., 1989
Mexico Pelibuey male lambs Elephant grass ad libitum alone + 20 or 30% (DM) duckweeds (Lemna sp. and Spirodela sp.) Improved nutrient digestibility, nitrogen retention and rumen ammonia concentration. Zetina-Cordoba et al., 2013
India Sikkim goats (meat) Elephant grass ad libitum Elephant grass fed alone could support the energy requirements of meat goats at maintenance. Chandra et al., 2012
Kenya Kenya Dual-Purpose male goats Elephant grass + pasture grass + Neonotonia wightii or Leucaena leucocephala (30% requirement) Increased average daily gain, particularly with leucaena. Njarui et al., 2003
Uganda 3-4 months kids Elephant grass ad libitum + 300 g of either gliricidia or gliricidia with leucaena or gliricidia + leucaena + maize bran Increased average daily gain. Mpairwe et al., 2002
Kenya 6 months old East African goats Elephant grass ad libitum + sun dried leaves of Pithecellobium dulce (22.5 g DM/kg LW0.75) Increased DM intake, OM digestibility, N retention and average daily gain. Kahindi et al., 2007
Malaysia Growing Boer x local female goats Elephant grass ad libitum + molasses, palm kernel meal and soybean waste or + commercial concentrate (1% liveweight) Higher growth performance with palm kernel supplementation than with commercial concentrate. Rahman et al., 2013
Kenya Lactating Toggenburg dairy goats Elephant grass (7 weeks growth) ad libitum Elephant grass fed alone could support the energy requirements of dry and pregnant goats, but not of lactating goats even if they are able to choose the most nutritive parts. Brown et al., 1988
Brazil 24 young male sheep Fresh dwarf Mott and Taiwan A-146 2.37 vs. tall Elephant B and IRI-381 as sole forage Dwarf cultivars increased DMI and supported gains of 69.0-72.6 g/day; sheep on tall cultivars lost weight. Silva et al., 2021a
Brazil 20 Santa Inês sheep Four elephant grass genotypes harvested after 55 days and fed as sole fresh forage The genotype with the highest DM digestibility had the lowest intake and digestible DM intake. Souza et al., 2017
Mexico 36 lambs Concentrate-only diet vs. diets containing 30% fresh CT-115, Maralfalfa or Mombasa grass on a DM basis CT-115 increased DMI but reduced digestibility; growth and carcass yield were not significantly affected. Escalante et al., 2026
Ghana 20 Djallonké ewes Elephant grass supplemented with Oxytenanthera abyssinica or Bambusa balcooa leaves Oxytenanthera supported greater intake and ADG than Bambusa; there was no unsupplemented treatment. Antwi et al., 2023
Brazil 8 cannulated adult wethers BRS Kurumi hay combined with 0, 33, 66 or 100% pinto-peanut hay in forage DM Legume inclusion increased OM and N intake; 33% increased digestible OM intake, but higher inclusion reduced OM digestibility. Dall-Orsoletta et al., 2017
Brazil 24 male kids Spineless-cactus diets containing 35% elephant grass hay vs. sugarcane bagasse Growth was similar; elephant grass hay reduced apparent digestibility but increased carcass weight and yield. Campelo-Lima et al., 2022
Brazil 24 crossbred male lambs Mott, IRI-381 or Elephant B silage as sole roughage at about 50% of diet DM Intake, slaughter weight, carcass yield and meat quality did not differ among cultivar silages. Soares et al., 2023
Colombia 10 lambs Sole elephant grass silage vs. 67:33 elephant grass:Tithonia diversifolia mixed silage The mixed silage increased intake, gain and carcass weight; lambs receiving sole low-protein silage lost weight. Huertas-González et al., 2023
Thailand 9 lactating Thai-native × Saanen goats Maize silage vs. conventional or anthocyanin-rich elephant grass silage elephant grass silages reduced DMI but maintained milk yield; antioxidant responses varied with sampling day. Chaokaur et al., 2024
Thailand 18 Saanen-crossbred goats Pakchong 1 silage replaced by 0, 50 or 100% purple elephant grass silage in TMR diets Milk yield was maintained; full replacement reduced somatic-cell count and changed antioxidant indicators. Onjai-uea et al., 2024

Hay

Elephant grass can be used as hay, though this is less common than feeding it fresh (Mannetje, 1992; FAO, 2015).

Dairy cattle

In Ethiopia, a TMR containing 70% elephant grass hay increased intake, apparent digestibility and milk yield relative to a TMR containing natural pasture hay at the same roughage-to-concentrate ratio (Mekuriaw et al., 2020).

Buffaloes

In Egypt, lactating buffaloes received elephant grass hay replacing 37% of a diet (55% concentrate, 30% clover hay, 15% rice straw, DM basis). There was no effect on milk and milk fat yields, though milk fat content was slightly changed, and milk protein and solid not fat (SNF) content increased. However, 66% substitution decreased yields, solid non fat and milk protein. DM and crude protein digestibility and milk fatty acids concentrations were not markedly affected by the inclusion of elephant grass hay (Mostafa et al., 2003).

Sheep

In Brazil, with lambs fed dwarf elephant grass hay cut at 30, 50, 70 and 90 days of regrowth, aging resulted in a decrease in NDF intake and DM, OM and NDF digestibility. Aging did not influence DM and OM intake, the flow of rumen microbial N into the small intestine, and efficiency of rumen microbial protein synthesis. Nitrogen intake was minimum at 70 days while N digestibility and retention were maximum at the same age (Kozloski et al., 2005). In another trial with lambs, elephant grass hay had a higher forage quality than bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) hay due to its higher voluntary intake of digestible OM. Sheep chewed elephant grass hay at a greater rate than bahia grass hay and spent less time ruminating, due to its less fibrous leaf structure and more readily digested leaf epidermis (Flores et al., 1993). In feedlot sheep, elephant grass supplemented with 30% concentrate allowed an average daily gain of 95 g/d, comparable to that obtained with buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris), Panicum molle and Urochloa mosambicensis (Camurca et al., 2002). Combining BRS Kurumi hay with pinto-peanut hay increased organic-matter and nitrogen intake in wethers, but inclusion above 33% reduced overall organic-matter digestibility and no production response was measured (Dall-Orsoletta et al., 2017).

Goats

In Brazil, chopped elephant grass hay (60 d regrowth) fed to goats resulted in DM intake and OM digestibility (61%) comparable to those obtained with pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and Sudan grass (Sorghum × drummondii) hays, and higher than those obtained with forage sorghum hays (Aguiar et al., 2006a). With growing goats fed a concentrate and elephant grass hay, the inclusion of 60% and 45% hay resulted in the best cost/benefit ratio for male and female goats, respectively (Medeiros et al., 2007). In balanced spineless-cactus diets for growing goats, 35% elephant grass hay supported similar growth and heavier carcasses than sugarcane bagasse, despite slightly lower apparent digestibility. This result does not apply to elephant grass hay fed alone (Campelo-Lima et al., 2022).

Silage

Nutritive value of elephant grass silage is dependent on the forage value at ensiling and is lower when old grass is used, compared to younger material Sources of readily fermentable carbohydrate such as molasses or sugarcane can improve the fermentation and feeding value of elephant grass silage (Yokota et al., 1991; Yokota et al., 1992; Cavali et al., 2010). See the section on Forage management on the "Description" tab for examples of silage ingredients and their benefits.

Dairy cattle

In San Salvador, replacing 75% of the maize silage component with well-prepared elephant grass silage increased DMI and microbial protein synthesis while maintaining milk yield and composition (Corea-Guillen et al., 2025).

Buffaloes

In China, a 75:25 fresh matter mixture of sugarcane tops and Guimu-1, an elephant grass-derived hybrid, improved fermentation, intake and apparent digestibility (Xie et al., 2023).

Sheep

In Brazil, silages of elephant grass cultivars Mott, IRI-381 and Elephant B used as the sole roughage at about 50% of diet DM produced similar intake, carcass yield and meat quality in lambs (Soares et al., 2023). In Colombia, a 67:33 elephant grass:Tithonia diversifolia mixed silage fed to lambs increased intake, gain and carcass weight relative to sole elephant grass silage containing only 6.5% crude protein (Huertas-González et al., 2023).

Goats

Conventional and anthocyanin-rich elephant grass silages maintained milk yield in dairy goat studies. Intake was lower than with maize silage in one trial, while purple elephant grass changed somatic-cell count, milk-quality or antioxidant indicators in another; these responses were cultivar- and study-specific (Chaokaur et al., 2024; Onjai-uea et al., 2024).

Pigs 

Information on the use of elephant grass in pig diets is very limited. Its high fibre content restricts its potential use, particularly for piglets, and it should be considered only as an ingredient in nutritionally balanced feeds rather than as a major forage source.

In one 60-day trial in China, freshly harvested Guiminyin or Purple elephant grass was chopped and incorporated at nominal rates of 10, 15 or 20% into fermented extruded maize–soybean complete feeds for Guike Black finishing pigs. During the first 30 days, the diet containing 20% Purple elephant grass increased average daily gain and gain-to-feed ratio relative to the control. Over the complete trial, however, the overall treatment effect on average daily gain was not significant, and carcass yield and measured meat-quality traits were unchanged. Only three pigs per treatment were sampled for carcass, blood and microbiota measurements, ingredient proportions other than elephant grass changed among diets, and reporting of the inclusion basis and animal numbers was inconsistent. The tested 20% rate is therefore not a general recommendation, and no direct evidence is available for piglets or breeding animals (Gao et al., 2022).

Poultry 

Direct poultry evidence concerns fermented, dried or freshly offered elephant grass within specific complete feeding systems. Results should not be transferred between poultry species or from processed meal to fresh forage without direct evidence.

Broiler chickens

In China, in slow-growing Jinling chickens, 5% fermented Guiminyin elephant grass maintained growth and feed efficiency comparable to the control, whereas 10% reduced growth. The experimental diets differed in crude protein and metabolisable energy, so the response cannot be attributed solely to elephant grass inclusion (Usman et al., 2026).

Laying hens

In China, in ISA laying hens, 5% dried ground elephant grass maintained laying performance and increased yolk lutein and beta-carotene. Effects on yolk pigmentation were not fully consistent, and changes in albumen quality and calcium-related measurements were transient. The study supports a bounded 5% inclusion result rather than a general pigmentation claim (Yan et al., 2019).

Turkeys

In Bangladesh, fresh elephant grass offered to turkeys aged 5 to 14 weeks with a reduced concentrate allowance maintained final live weight when the planned concentrate replacement was 25%, whereas 50% replacement reduced growth (Asaduzzaman, 2019).

Geese

In China, 12% of dried ground elephant grass replacing part of maize grain in diets of growing Hortobágyi geese for 70 days maintained growth and feed conversion, whereas 24% reduced growth and nutrient utilisation and lowered abdominal fat (Liu et al., 2024).

Rabbits 

Elephant grass can be fed to rabbits as fresh forage or incorporated into complete feeds as dried leaf meal. Young, leafy material is preferable, since increasing maturity reduces protein content and increases fibre concentration. Elephant grass supplies useful fibre but should not be used as the sole feed for growing rabbits; it must be complemented with feeds supplying adequate protein and energy. Elephant grass is commonly used as fresh forage for rabbit feeding in tropical countries such as Vietnam (Dinh Van Binh et al., 1991), Mozambique (Demeterova et al., 1991), Nigeria (Ekpenyong, 1984; Amata et al., 2013) and Venezuela (Nieves et al., 1996).

Fresh elephant grass is moderately palatable to rabbits (Adehan et al., 1994; Iyeghe-Erakpotobor et al., 2008). Palatability depends strongly on adaptation and feeding method. Intake was relatively low when rabbits received the forage for only five hours before concentrate feeding, whereas they consumed about 86% of the amount offered when the grass and concentrate were available concurrently throughout the day (Iyeghe-Erakpotobor et al., 2008). Palatability can be high during the rainy season when the protein content is high (17-18% DM) (Raharjo et al., 1986) and low during the dry season (McNitt, 1980; Muir et al., 1996).

Fresh elephant grass fed as the sole feed did not support growth and induced weight losses (Raharjo et al., 1986). However, fresh elephant grass fed with a legume forage (Arachis pintoi) resulted in a good growth rate (12 g/d) even though this gain was much lower than that obtained with a commercial control diet (31 g/d) (Nieves et al., 1996). In a trial in Malaysia with fresh dwarf elephant grass offered ad libitum, rabbits receiving half the concentrate allowance of the control animals had an average daily gain of 6.4 g, compared with 8.0 g for rabbits receiving concentrate alone; the difference was not significant. Reducing the concentrate allowance to one-quarter decreased total intake and daily gain to 3.8 g. Fresh dwarf elephant grass may therefore replace part of the concentrate allowance, but it did not compensate for a severe restriction of concentrate in this experiment (Rahman et al., 2020b).

Elephant grass hay was safely introduced in complete balanced diets up to 20-25%, as the main source of fibre, provided that its low protein content (9-10%) and high fibre level of fibre (40-45% ADF) were taken into account (Raharjo et al., 1988; Tangendjaja et al., 1990). Nevertheless, the low concentration of the protein in lysine (about 60% of requirements), and particularly in sulphur-containing amino acids (about 40-50% of requirements), should be considered. Depending on its protein and fibre content, the digestible energy content of elephant grass may vary from 6.0-6.5 to 7.9 MJ/kg DM (Raharjo et al., 1986). In growing rabbits in Cameroon, replacing 25–75% of the wheat bran with elephant grass leaf meal, corresponding to 10–30% of the complete diet, did not significantly affect daily weight gain or carcass yield. Complete replacement of wheat bran, corresponding to 40% elephant grass leaf meal, impaired feed conversion and reduced final live weight and carcass weight. The diet containing 20% leaf meal had the numerically lowest feed conversion ratio and the lowest feed cost under local conditions, but its feed conversion ratio was not significantly different from that of the control diet (Tendonkeng et al., 2025).

Horses and donkeys 

Information on the feeding value of elephant grass for equids is limited. In Brazil, 24 growing horses received rations in which sugar cane replaced 0–50% of Cameroon elephant grass over 126 days. Replacement level did not affect dry matter, organic matter, NDF or ADF intake, live-weight gain or body measurements. Average daily gain across treatments was 743 g. However, crude protein, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and potassium intake declined as the proportion of sugar cane increased. The experiment indicates that elephant grass can be used as the forage component of rations for growing horses, but it does not establish its adequacy as a sole feed or a generally applicable inclusion level (Garcia et al., 1997).

In Indonesia, twelve Sandalwood horses used for anti-tetanus serum production received common elephant grass, Mott elephant grass, or mixtures containing 67% of either elephant grass and 33% Kikuyu grass as the sole forage, together with 2.61 kg/day of concentrate. The diets were fed for ten weeks. The horses receiving Mott elephant grass had the highest antibody titre, but the correlation between forage crude protein content and antibody titre was weak. The authors therefore found no evidence that the higher-protein forages improved antibody production (Mahari et al., 2021). A short study with six adult Sandalwood horses compared feeding behaviour when common elephant grass, Mott elephant grass or Kikuyu grass was offered at 7 kg twice daily. Prehension movements were more frequent with both elephant grasses than with Kikuyu grass, while the number of chewing movements per unit of dry matter was highest for common elephant grass (Lupitasari et al., 2023).

Other species 

Guinea pigs

Fresh elephant grass can be used as a forage component in guinea pig diets, although direct evidence of its feeding value remains limited. In a multiple-choice test conducted in Benin with young and adult guinea pigs, elephant grass was consumed but was less preferred than local Guinea grass, butterfly pea (Centrosema pubescens) and coat buttons (Tridax procumbens). Its preference index ranged from 0.07 to 0.09, compared with 0.21–0.41 for local Guinea grass. These results apply only to short choice tests and do not measure voluntary intake when elephant grass is offered alone or its effects on animal performance (Zoffoun et al., 2019).

Fresh elephant grass was used successfully as the common basal forage in a reproductive trial with 72 local guinea pigs in Cameroon. The grass was offered ad libitum during mating, gestation and lactation, together with 20 g/day of concentrate. Fertility ranged from 93.3 to 100%, litter size from 1.79 to 2.07 and mean viability at weaning from 93.2 to 100%. However, the experimental treatments differed in their cassava leaf meal content, whereas all animals received the same elephant grass (Mweugang et al., 2016).

Nutritional tables

Avg: average or predicted value; SD: standard deviation; Min: minimum value; Max: maximum value; Nb: number of values (samples) used

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 17.9 5.9 8.6 41.0 1036  
Crude protein % DM 9.7 4.3 2.8 22.7 2209  
Crude fibre % DM 36.1 3.9 25.5 43.2 1091 *
NDF % DM 71.5 7.1 54.1 79.9 433 *
ADF % DM 42.5 6.4 29.5 52.9 377 *
Lignin % DM 5.7 1.5 2.7 9.1 365 *
Ether extract % DM 2.0 0.6 1.0 3.8 1022  
Ash % DM 13.8 4.8 3.9 25.1 2200  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 17.4 1.1 16.0 18.9 5 *
               
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Calcium g/kg DM 3.6 1.3 1.4 7.6 1160  
Phosphorus g/kg DM 2.9 1.2 0.7 6.6 1762  
Potassium g/kg DM 29.0 13.9 4.9 68.0 1207  
Sodium g/kg DM 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.8 89  
Magnesium g/kg DM 3.0 1.1 1.3 6.2 1031  
Manganese mg/kg DM 91 56 19 238 38  
Zinc mg/kg DM 45 26 20 129 45  
Copper mg/kg DM 11 4 5 24 55  
Iron mg/kg DM 413 323 82 1175 21  
               
Amino acids Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Arginine % protein 2.5   2.1 3.0 2  
Cystine % protein 0.2       1  
Histidine % protein 1.6   1.4 1.9 2  
Isoleucine % protein 3.9   3.1 4.7 2  
Leucine % protein 5.7   5.2 6.2 2  
Lysine % protein 3.1   3.1 3.1 2  
Methionine % protein 1.4       1  
Phenylalanine % protein 3.6       1  
Threonine % protein 3.6   3.5 3.8 2  
Tryptophan % protein 0.6       1  
Tyrosine % protein 4.9       1  
Valine % protein 5.1   4.4 5.9 2  
               
Secondary metabolites Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Tannins (eq. tannic acid) g/kg DM 22.2       1  
Tannins, condensed (eq. catechin) g/kg DM 12.4   3.0 21.8 2  
               
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
OM digestibility, ruminants % 61.4 3.8 55.4 70.6 30 *
OM digestibility, ruminants (gas production) % 67       1  
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 58.7   56.9 72.5 2 *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 10.2         *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 8.2         *
ME ruminants (gas production) MJ/kg DM 8.2 1.1 6.4 9.2 5  
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 57.3 11.9 33.0 73.0 34  
c (N) h-1 0.012       1  

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Abdulrazak et al., 1996; Abou-Ashour et al., 1984; AFZ, 2011; Aguiar et al., 2006; Ajayi et al., 2011; Aka et al., 2004; Alibes et al., 1990; Aumont et al., 1991; Axtmayer et al., 1940; Babayemi, 2007; Bartha, 1970; Bayble et al., 2007; Butterworth, 1963; Butterworth, 1965; Calles et al., 1982; Carvalho Junior et al., 2009; CGIAR, 2009; CIRAD, 1991; Clipes et al., 2006; Demeterova et al., 1991; Dixon, 1986; Dongmeza et al., 2009; Elliott, 1956; Evitayani et al., 2004; Evitayani et al., 2004; French, 1943; Garcia et al., 2008; González-García et al., 2008; Gowda et al., 2004; Hassan et al., 1979; Hassoun, 2009; Holm, 1971; Holm, 1971; Iyeghe-Erakpotobor et al., 2008; Juma et al., 2006; Kaitho et al., 1998; Kambashi et al., 2014; Khanum et al., 2007; Komwihangilo et al., 2007; Kumar et al., 2012; Lacerda et al., 2004; Lanyasunya et al., 2006; Lim Han Kuo, 1967; Lin et al., 1988; ListaI et al., 2008; Mahyuddin et al., 1988; Marshall et al., 1963; Mecha et al., 1980; Mendieta-Araica et al., 2009; Mendieta-Araica et al., 2011; Mendieta-Araica et al., 2011; Mlay et al., 2006; Mtui et al., 2006; Nasrullah et al., 2003; Ngo Van Man et al., 2003; Niang et al., 1998; Njwe et al., 1990; Nordfeldt et al., 1952; Olubajo et al., 1974; Osuga et al., 2006; Palafox et al., 1961; Palieraqui et al., 2006; Pozy et al., 1996; Ribeiro Filho et al., 2000; Richard et al., 1989; Sarwatt et al., 2004; Shem et al., 1999; Shibata et al., 1988; Teguia et al., 1999; Telford et al., 1947; Tisserand et al., 1989; Tuah et al., 1974; Van Eys et al., 1986; Van Eys et al., 1987; Vicente Chandler et al., 1974; Warly et al., 2006; Xandé et al., 1989

Last updated on 22/01/2015 17:40:13

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 89.3 6.8 79.2 98.3 8  
Crude protein % DM 10.3 3.3 5.5 15.1 18  
Crude fibre % DM 35.6 2.7 34.5 40.3 4 *
NDF % DM 71.1 5.5 60.8 79.1 16 *
ADF % DM 41.9 6.2 33.0 50.2 16 *
Lignin % DM 5.8 2.7 4.1 12.9 15 *
Ether extract % DM 1.9 0.5 1.3 2.5 7  
Ash % DM 10.9 2.0 5.3 13.2 18  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 17.9         *
               
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Calcium g/kg DM 2.8 0.2 2.5 2.9 3  
Phosphorus g/kg DM 2.3 0.4 1.8 2.6 3  
Potassium g/kg DM 26.7 13.7 13.6 40.9 3  
Magnesium g/kg DM 1.6 0.5 1.3 2.2 3  
               
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
OM digestibility, ruminants % 58.7 9.0 44.5 72.4 13 *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 55.3         *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 9.9         *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 7.9         *
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 59.4 10.2 40.7 73.2 7  
a (N) % 20.9       1  
b (N) % 60.8       1  
c (N) h-1 0.024       1  
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=4%) % 44         *
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=6%) % 38         *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Aguiar et al., 2006; Aguiar et al., 2006; Anele et al., 2011; Chiou et al., 1995; CIRAD, 1991; Flores et al., 1993; Kozloski et al., 2003; Sarwar et al., 1999; Schnaider et al., 2014; Van Wyk et al., 1951; Zetina-Cordoba et al., 2012

Last updated on 22/01/2015 17:45:08

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 19.5 6.1 9.1 25.9 8  
Crude protein % DM 6.5 2.1 4.2 10.5 10  
Crude fibre % DM 37.0 4.5 29.7 42.7 6  
NDF % DM 72.6 20.1 42.7 77.7 3 *
ADF % DM 43.6 10.6 28.0 52.0 4 *
Lignin % DM 6.2         *
Ether extract % DM 1.8 0.9 0.9 3.8 9  
Ash % DM 12.6 2.6 9.0 15.7 10  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 17.4         *
               
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Calcium g/kg DM 2.5 1.3 1.2 3.8 3  
Phosphorus g/kg DM 3.6 1.9 1.5 4.9 3  
Potassium g/kg DM 36.4 6.1 29.5 41.2 3  
Magnesium g/kg DM 2.3 0.5 1.8 2.7 3  
               
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
OM digestibility, ruminants % 57.9         *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 53.7         *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 9.3         *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 7.5         *
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 62.0       1  
a (N) % 48.8       1  
b (N) % 12.9       1  
c (N) h-1 0.068       1  
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=4%) % 57         *
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=6%) % 56         *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Chizzotti et al., 2005; CIRAD, 1991; Elliott, 1956; Marcondes et al., 2009; Rêgo et al., 2010; Tuah et al., 1974; Xandé et al., 1989

Last updated on 22/01/2015 17:43:20

References
References 
Datasheet citation 

Heuzé V., Tran G., Giger-Reverdin S., Lebas F., 2026. Elephant grass (Cenchrus purpureus). Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/395 Last updated on July 25, 2026, 15:41

English correction by Tim Smith (Animal Science consultant) and Hélène Thiollet (AFZ)